Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PEYTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PEYTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PEYTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
4940A3899S1963CO035005Peyton7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.1722221,-104.7880554
4940A3900S1963CO035006Peyton7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.1330566,-104.6680527

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PEYTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PEYTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PEYTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PEYTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PEYTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PEYTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PEYTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PEYTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing PEYTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Peyton-Pring-Crowfoot sandy loams, 5 to 25 percent slopesPpE29611498748jqznco62219681:20000
Peyton sandy loam, 3 to 9 percent slopesPeD5066498746jqzlco62219681:20000
Peyton-Pring-Crowfoot complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes, erodedPrE21749498749jqzpco62219681:20000
Peyton sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesPeB1252498745jqzkco62219681:20000
Peyton sandy loam, wet, 1 to 5 percent slopesPfC1032498747jqzmco62219681:20000
Cruckton-Peyton sandy loams, 7 to 20 percent slopesCtE916498714jqykco62219681:20000
Peyton-Elbeth sandy loams, 8 to 25 percent slopes3514316496426jnkrco62319771:24000
Peyton sandy loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes349734496425jnkqco62319771:24000
Bluerim-Peyton sandy loams, 8 to 20 percent slopes49097496431jnkxco62319771:24000
Peyton-Pring complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes368108496427jnksco62319771:24000
Peyton-Pring complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes681440895431369fco62519751:24000
Peyton-Pring complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes691125995432369gco62519751:24000
Peyton sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes67546895430369dco62519751:24000
Peyton sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes66145095429369cco62519751:24000
Peyton-Juget very gravelly loamy sands, 5 to 20 percent slopesPgE2529497597jpsjco64319751:20000
Peyton-Pring-Crowfoot complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes, eroded553177084jqzpco6451:24000
Worf variant-Cushman variant-Peyton association, rolling307123816937wf2twy61919711:24000
Relsob-Peyton sandy loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes2467725502375jvrnwy62519851:24000
Peyton-Holderness loams, 3 to 15 percent slopes2375278502363jvr8wy62519851:24000
Worf variant-Cushman variant-Peyton association, rolling3072515502451jvv3wy62519851:24000
Peyton sandy loam, 1 to 10 percent slopes1835001503048jwgcwy71319861:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PEYTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .