Soil Data Explorer - PEEVER

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PEEVER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PEEVER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PEEVER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
102A	UMN3634	S1982MN155039 (3634)	Peever	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.615612,-96.7538834
102A	UMN3633	S1982MN1553633	Peever	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.614557,-96.760117
102A	93P0768	S1993MN111006	Peever	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	46.1724434,-95.9368896

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PEEVER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PEEVER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the PEEVER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the PEEVER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PEEVER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the PEEVER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PEEVER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PEEVER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. MN-2010-09-08-22 | Otter Tail County - 2001

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Forman-Buse-Peever association (Soil Survey of Otter Tail County, Minnesota; 2001).

2. MN-2010-09-27-03 | Lac qui Parle County -

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Forman-Mehurin-Parnell association (Soil Survey of Lac qui Parle County, Minnesota).

Map Units

Map units containing PEEVER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Peever clay loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	646C	4433	435882	gmkq	mn111	1996	1:20000
Peever-Mehurin complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes	779B	3469	435949	gmmw	mn111	1996	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes	646D	1737	435883	gmkr	mn111	1996	1:20000
Peever-Buse complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes	822B	2115	357382	czwg	mn155	1986	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	646B	295	357375	2w8f7	mn155	1986	1:20000
Gwinner-Peever-Parnell complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G205A	10431	2581137	2pwzz	nd073	1992	1:20000
Peever-Gwinner complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes	G206B	1745	2581138	2px01	nd073	1992	1:20000
Gwinner-Peever complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G206A	166	2506014	2px00	nd073	1992	1:20000
Gwinner-Peever complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G206A	3135	2577410	2px00	nd077	2005	1:12000
Peever-Forman complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G207A	989	2577393	2px02	nd077	2005	1:12000
Forman-Peever complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes	J211B	963	1544942	1nvmv	nd077	2005	1:12000
Peever-Gwinner complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes	G206B	814	2577418	2px01	nd077	2005	1:12000
Gwinner-Peever complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	J213A	95	1544944	1nvmx	nd077	2005	1:12000
Gwinner-Peever complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G206A	13671	2579486	2px00	nd081	1959	1:12000
Gwinner-Peever-Parnell complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G205A	9647	2579458	2pwzz	nd081	1959	1:12000
Peever-Gwinner complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes	G206B	105	2579513	2px01	nd081	1959	1:12000
Peever-Buse clay loams, 1 to 6 percent slopes	G208B	1391	2797745	2sd22	sd013	1987	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G204A	669	2797744	2sd20	sd013	1987	1:20000
Peever-Cavour complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G202A	58	2797743	2sd1y	sd013	1987	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G204A	2091	2798008	2sd20	sd025	1992	1:20000
Peever-Cavour complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G202A	1956	2798006	2sd1y	sd025	1992	1:20000
Peever-Cresbard-Tonka complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G203A	1669	2798007	2sd1z	sd025	1992	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes	G204B	569	2798009	2sd21	sd025	1992	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	PcA	2158	2947369	2w8f6	sd039	1992	1:20000
Peever clay loam, coteau, 2 to 6 percent slopes	PeB	1238	416887	fzsz	sd039	1992	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	PcB	1106	2947367	2w8f7	sd039	1992	1:20000
Peever-Cavour clay loams	Pg	352	416888	fzt0	sd039	1992	1:20000
Peever clay loam, coteau, 0 to 2 percent slopes	PeA	127	416886	fzsy	sd039	1992	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	PeA	24984	2947370	2w8f6	sd051	1977	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	PeB	21652	2947368	2w8f7	sd051	1977	1:20000
Peever-Cavour complex	Pd	17790	418174	g14h	sd051	1977	1:20000
Peever clay loam, coteau, 2 to 6 percent slopes	PcB	6107	418172	g14f	sd051	1977	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 6 to 9 percent slopes	PcC	4691	418173	g14g	sd051	1977	1:20000
Peever-Tonka complex	Pe	1130	418175	g14j	sd051	1977	1:20000
Peever clay loam, coteau, 0 to 2 percent slopes	PcA	602	418171	g14d	sd051	1977	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	PeB	6281	416591	2w8f7	sd091	1970	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	PeA	3890	416590	2w8f6	sd091	1970	1:20000
Peever-Hamerly complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	PhA	3260	416593	fzhh	sd091	1970	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 6 to 9 percent slopes	PeC	490	416592	fzhg	sd091	1970	1:20000
Gwinner-Peever complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G206A	117	2799276	2px00	sd091	1970	1:20000
Peever-Gwinner complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes	G206B	11	2799277	2px01	sd091	1970	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	PeB	50065	417854	2w8f7	sd109	1977	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	PeA	33587	417853	2w8f6	sd109	1977	1:20000
Peever-Tonka complex	Pk	17824	417857	g0t8	sd109	1977	1:20000
Peever clay loam, 6 to 9 percent slopes	PeC	4382	417855	g0t6	sd109	1977	1:20000
Peever-Cavour complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	PhA	1655	417856	g0t7	sd109	1977	1:20000
Peever-Buse clay loams, 1 to 6 percent slopes	G208B	1009	2799589	2sd22	sd115	1997	1:24000
Peever-Cavour complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G202A	740	2799586	2sd1y	sd115	1997	1:24000
Peever-Cresbard-Tonka complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G203A	517	2799587	2sd1z	sd115	1997	1:24000
Peever clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	G204A	201	2799588	2sd20	sd115	1997	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PEEVER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).