Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PEELER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PEELER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PEELER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
43B92P106792MT043011Peeler6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.5380554,-112.0294418
48A91P099991CO069008Peeler7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.664444,-105.5616684
48A99P000398CO051003Peeler7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.7572212,-106.5668869

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PEELER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PEELER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PEELER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PEELER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PEELER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PEELER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PEELER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PEELER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing PEELER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Granile-Peeler complex, 25 to 50 percent slopes1313181498376jqlnco63519791:24000
Peeler sandy loam, 10 to 30 percent slopes271760498391jqm4co63519791:24000
Granile-Peeler complex, 25 to 50 percent slopes541M904509876k3kmco63620111:24000
Grimstone-Peeler-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes574668497502jppgco64119801:24000
Grimstone-Peeler-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes562172497501jppfco64119801:24000
Peeler sandy loam, 25 to 40 percent slopesPeF14016497813jq0hco64619731:24000
Peeler sandy loam, 5 to 25 percent slopesPeE2437497812jq0gco64619731:24000
Frisco-Peeler gravelly sandy loams, 25 to 65 percent slopes3333663497857jq1xco64919771:24000
Frisco-Peeler gravelly sandy loams, 6 to 25 percent slopes329408497856jq1wco64919771:24000
Peeler sandy loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes632908497890jq2zco64919771:24000
Frisco-Peeler gravelly sandy loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes31960497855jq1vco64919771:24000
Peeler sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes62793497889jq2yco64919771:24000
Peeler loam, 5 to 40 percent slopes31715506446jzzzco65119991:24000
Grimstone-Peeler-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes11807512683k6h5co65320001:24000
Schofield-Peeler gravelly sandy loams, 25 to 60 percent slopesSdF35501509778k3ggco66119681:31680
Schofield-Peeler very stony sandy loams, 25 to 60 percent slopesSeF11510509779k3ghco66119681:31680
Schofield-Peeler gravelly sandy loams, 5 to 25 percent slopesSdE7650509777k3gfco66119681:31680
Blacksnag-Peeler complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3614421507149k0qnco67220031:24000
Blacksnag-Peeler complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes3603227507148k0qmco67220031:24000
Angostura-Peeler-Mulgon complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes726469496914jp2hco68419841:24000
Peeler-Anvik, warm complex, 25 to 40 percent slopes9111939496938jp38co68419841:24000
Angostura-Peeler-Mulgon complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes88770496925jp2vco68419841:24000
Peeler-Mulgon-Emerald complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes926760496939jp39co68419841:24000
Scout-Mulgon-Peeler complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes1153391496839jp02co68419841:24000
Peeler-Mulgon-Emerald complex, 25 to 50 percent slopes933157496940jp3bco68419841:24000
Peeler stony fine sandy loam, 5 to 25 percent slopes, very stony1471651497110jp8tco68619921:31680
Frisco-Peeler complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes5F24601497311jph9co69019741:24000
Frisco-Peeler complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes5E5919497310jph8co69019741:24000
Peeler-Comad complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, very stony419E36185969120f51mt60520071:24000
Peeler-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes3486F5915166252tbmt62719981:24000
Peeler-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes486F29881478294ytpmt63019911:24000
Peeler stony sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes386E14601478034ysvmt63019911:24000
Peeler gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes340E86317031471v587mt63520061:24000
Basincreek-Peeler-Stecum complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes372E55517031581v58lmt63520061:24000
Peeler-Comad complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, very stony419E44617031681v58xmt63520061:24000
Basincreek-Peeler-Stecum complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes372E3076362400d53bmt67020071:24000
Peeler gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes, stony340E1222362392d532mt67020071:24000
Peeler-Bobowic-Zonite complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes356E1182362382d52rmt67020071:24000
Peeler-Comad complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes, very stony419E1025114746317j0ymt67020071:24000
Bobowic-Peeler-Caseypeak complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes410E647991616128vmmt67020071:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PEELER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .