Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PARADOX soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PARADOX, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PARADOX were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PARADOX soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PARADOX series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PARADOX series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PARADOX series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PARADOX share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PARADOX series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PARADOX series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PARADOX, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing PARADOX as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Paradox fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes7334244502115jvh8co67519861:24000
Paradox fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopesMC11610163170449k081co67519861:24000
Paradox fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopesMC23143170492k081co67919761:24000
Paradox fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes116883506696k081co68019701:31680
Paradox loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes41354506262jzt1co69219981:24000
Paradox loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes1684763505437jyyfut04719991:24000
Polychrome-Paradox association, 8 to 40 percent slopes1843459505455jyz0ut04719991:24000
Paradox loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes1693171505438jyygut04719991:24000
Paradox silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes1711953505441jyykut04719991:24000
Yarts-Paradox complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes2821225505564jz2jut04719991:24000
Paradox-Badland association, 8 to 25 percent slopes1721114505442jyylut04719991:24000
Paradox loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes170703505440jyyjut04719991:24000
Paradox-Milok complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesELB1492504642jy3sut6291:24000
Mathis Family-Paradox Family-Parida Family complex, 20 to 70 percent slopes6901604532412402vb09ut64119711:24000
Paradox Family-Weska complex, 15 to 75 percent slopes6901551532412422vb0mut64119711:24000
Mathis Family-Paradox Family-Parida Family complex, 20 to 70 percent slopes6901601817728558782vb09ut6901:24000
Paradox Family-Weska complex, 15 to 75 percent slopes690155244228558802vb0mut6901:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PARADOX soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .