Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the PAQUIN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of PAQUIN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to PAQUIN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
9204N0461S2003MI131008Paquin6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.8693237,-89.0181732
9204N0463S2003MI131010Paquin6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.9320679,-89.1971817

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the PAQUIN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the PAQUIN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PAQUIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PAQUIN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with PAQUIN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the PAQUIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the PAQUIN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with PAQUIN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MI-2010-09-07-10 | Mackinac County - 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Wallace-Spot association (Soil Survey of Mackinac County, Michigan; 1997).

  2. MI-2012-02-06-37 | Mackinac County - 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Wallace-Spot association (Soil Survey of Mackinac County, Michigan; 1997).

Map Units

Map units containing PAQUIN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Paquin-Finch sands, 0 to 6 percent slopes160B727914553271kvd1mi00320071:24000
Paquin sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes16A601914552511kv9lmi00320071:24000
Paquin-Spot complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes176B8730399608fdtlmi09520041:24000
Paquin sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes61B7384627508p1z6mi09520041:24000
Paquin-Finch sands, 0 to 6 percent slopes173B5691631318p5y3mi09520041:24000
Paquin sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes61B10318416416fz9smi09719941:20000
Paquin-Finch sands, 0 to 6 percent slopes173B5929416350fz7nmi09719941:20000
Paquin-Spot complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes176B3126416353fz7rmi09719941:20000
Ingalls-Paquin complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes86B320416429fzb6mi09719941:20000
Paquin-Finch sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes160B3933395106f84cmi10319991:24000
Paquin sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes16A3176395118f84rmi10319991:24000
Paquin sand, 1 to 4 percent slopes164B9514566041kwq7mi13120071:24000
Paquin sand, 0 to 3 percent slope16A1265714570251kx4tmi15320071:24000
Paquin-Finch sands, 0 to 6 percent slopes160B429514569211kx1gmi15320071:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the PAQUIN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .