Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the OGLALA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of OGLALA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to OGLALA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
6486P010184NE165034Oglala7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.5788879,-103.7372208
6488P017987NE161037Oglala5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.7655563,-102.559166

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the OGLALA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the OGLALA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the OGLALA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the OGLALA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with OGLALA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the OGLALA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the OGLALA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with OGLALA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NE-2012-02-13-94 | Sheridan County - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Oglala-Alliance-Canyon association (Soil Survey of Sheridan County, Nebraska; 2002).

  2. NE-2012-02-14-02 | Sioux County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Busher-Tassel-Jayem association (Soil Survey of Sioux County, Nebraska; 1998).

  3. SD-2012-03-14-01 | Bennett County - May 1971

    Typical association of Valentine, Mosher, Minatare, Loup, Keith, Rosebud, Oglala, and Canyon soils in the southern part of Bennett County (Soil Survey of Bennett County, SD; 1971).

  4. SD-2012-03-15-91 | Shannon County - April 1971

    Representative pattern of soils in association 1 (Soil Survey of Shannon County, SD; 1971).

  5. SD-2012-03-15-92 | Shannon County - April 1971

    Representative pattern of soils in association 2 (Soil Survey of Shannon County, SD; 1971).

Map Units

Map units containing OGLALA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Oglala-Canyon complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes52061853822174542tvvqne01319801:20000
Oglala-Canyon very fine sandy loams, 9 to 30 percent slopes521588303578172t34cne01319801:20000
Oglala-Canyon loams, 9 to 25 percent slopes5211352223581402tvt2ne04519731:20000
Oglala loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes520099883581392y6fcne04519731:20000
Oglala-Canyon complex, 6 to 9 percent slopes5207107722175612tvvnne04519731:20000
Oglala-Canyon very fine sandy loams, 9 to 30 percent slopes521583122175782t34cne04519731:20000
Oglala-Canyon complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes520621022175252tvvqne04519731:20000
Oglala-Canyon complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes5206384116926432tvvqne12319811:20000
Oglala-Canyon complex, 6 to 9 percent slopes5207544701006212tvvnne16119921:20000
Oglala-Canyon complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes5205234361006202tvvkne16119921:20000
Oglala-Canyon loams, 9 to 25 percent slopes5210140691006222tvt2ne16119921:20000
Oglala-Canyon complex, 3 to 9 percent slopes5206485713579752tvvqne16519931:20000
Oglala-Canyon very fine sandy loams, 9 to 30 percent slopes5215316113579762t34cne16519931:20000
Oglala very fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes5201203713579702y6f8ne16519931:20000
Oglala very fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes5202127903579712y6f9ne16519931:20000
Oglala very fine sandy loam, 6 to 9 percent slopes520311223579722y6fbne16519931:20000
Oglala-Canyon loams, 9 to 25 percent slopesOcE909713527562tvt2sd00720041:20000
Canyon-Oglala loams, 18 to 40 percent slopesCoF577843527252tzz8sd00720041:20000
Oglala-Rosebud silt loams, 3 to 6 percent slopesOrB2211352758cv29sd00720041:20000
Oglala-Rosebud silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesOrA1751352757cv28sd00720041:20000
Oglala-Canyon loams, 9 to 25 percent slopesOcE5996729254842tvt2sd61019651:20000
Canyon-Oglala loams, 18 to 40 percent slopesCaF1528629254782tzz8sd61019651:20000
Oglala-Canyon, moist loams, 9 to 25 percent slopesU545E206724854132tvvmsd61220111:20000
Canyon, moist-Rock outcrop, sandstone-Oglala complex, 15 to 40 percent slopesU100F183724852432pf34sd61220111:20000
Canyon-Oglala loams, 18 to 40 percent slopesU095F38724852472tzz8sd61220111:20000
Oglala-Canyon loams, 9 to 25 percent slopesOcE14074925827222tvt2sd61320111:24000
Canyon-Oglala loams, 18 to 40 percent slopesCaF7248125826872tzz8sd61320111:24000
Oglala-Canyon, moist loams, 9 to 25 percent slopesU545E168025828502tvvmsd61320111:24000
Canyon, moist-Rock outcrop, sandstone-Oglala complex, 15 to 40 percent slopesU100F78725828162pf34sd61320111:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the OGLALA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .