Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the NUSIL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of NUSIL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to NUSIL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
83A40A467576TX013001Nusil3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.8130555555556,-98.355

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the NUSIL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the NUSIL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NUSIL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NUSIL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with NUSIL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NUSIL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NUSIL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with NUSIL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TX-2010-11-03-10 | Goliad County - 2010

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Buchel-Meguin-Sinton general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Goliad County, Texas; 2010).

  2. TX-2010-11-03-12 | Goliad County - 2010

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Papalote-Weesatche general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Goliad County, Texas; 2010).

Map Units

Map units containing NUSIL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Nusil-Rhymes association, 0 to 5 percent slopes30618433625352v3bqtx01319771:24000
Nusil loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes292926362533d57mtx01319771:24000
Nusil fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes155965362751d5gntx02519791:24000
Nusil-Rhymes association, 0 to 5 percent slopes2836873627652v3bqtx02519791:24000
Nusil-Rhymes association, 0 to 5 percent slopesNsC56833650782v3bqtx12319731:20000
Nusil loamy fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopesNuC31524032782lnt3tx13120081:24000
Nusil fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopesNuC648624368142mspxtx17520101:24000
Nusil fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesNuC4835366587d9gdtx17719971:24000
Nusil fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopesNuC9107368416dccdtx25519921:24000
Nusil fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopesNuC9205369651ddn7tx29719971:24000
Nusil-Rhymes association, 0 to 5 percent slopesRNB167424236852v3bqtx31120101:24000
Nusil soils, 0 to 5 percent slopesNuC18436370567dflstx32519721:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the NUSIL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .