Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the NINIGRET soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of NINIGRET, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to NINIGRET were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
144A40A04471959MA005002Ninigret5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.9660873,-71.2708588

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the NINIGRET soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the NINIGRET series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NINIGRET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NINIGRET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with NINIGRET share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NINIGRET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NINIGRET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with NINIGRET, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CT-2011-05-31-04 | Fairfield County - 1981

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Agawam-Hinckley-Haven map unit (Soil Survey of Fairfield County, Conneticut; 1981).

  2. CT-2011-05-31-08 | New London County - 1983

    Typical pattern of soils in the Hinckley-Merrimac-Agawam general soil map unit (Soil Survey of New London County, Conneticut; 1983).

  3. CT-2011-05-31-11 | Windham County - 1981

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Hinckley-Merrimac association (Soil Survey of Windham County, Conneticut; 1981).

Map Units

Map units containing NINIGRET as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes701A895733959762y07dct60120031:12000
Ninigret-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes221A216933956549lk7ct60120031:12000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes701B120633959772y07fct60120031:12000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, cold, 0 to 3 percent slopes421A973395918qwypct60120031:12000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes701A514634003492y07dct60220031:12000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes701B134934003502y07fct60220031:12000
Ninigret-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes221A5433960279lk7ct60220031:12000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes276A13862788922tyr6ma01120121:12000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes276B7412788912tyr7ma01120121:12000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes276B21624842292tyr7ma02320101:12000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes276A14424842282tyr6ma02320101:12000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes276A3202770332tyr6ma60219761:20000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes276A2337800052tyr6ma60319791:20000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes276B4927905312tyr7ma60519771:15840
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes276A3957905282tyr6ma60519771:15840
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes276B1257911632tyr7ma60619811:15840
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes276A1057911602tyr6ma60619811:15840
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes276B13342774672tyr6ma60719751:15840
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes276A12322777562tyr6ma60919801:15840
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes276B4692777572tyr7ma60919801:15840
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes276A5128075482tyr6ma61319821:20000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesNgB156532848569kdxme60619661:15840
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes513B5182796832tyr7nh00519851:20000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes513A4082796822tyr6nh00519851:20000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesNnA4412798042tyr6nh01919811:20000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesNnA5312809882tyr6nh60119801:20000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesNnB1462809892tyr7nh60119801:20000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes513B9022802202tyr6nh60920071:24000
Agawam-Ninigret fine sandy loams, 3 to 8 percent slopes94B33120241382tx08nh60920071:24000
Agawam-Ninigret fine sandy loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes94A29820241372tx09nh60920071:24000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes162B11302914692tyr7ny03520071:24000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesNt13842862622tyr6ri60019771:12000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesNnB17342794142tyr5vt01719751:20000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesNnC3112794152tx06vt01719751:20000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes54A3932823742tyr6vt02119851:20000
Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes9B36272833022tyr5vt02720001:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the NINIGRET soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .