Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the NEWTONIA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of NEWTONIA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to NEWTONIA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
11240A021860OK115001Newtonia6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.8092384,-94.8549652
11240A471360OK115002Newtonia6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.8711128,-94.785553
11240A1801S1955KS099001NEWTONIA4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.2336121,-95.2122192
115BM93185201993MO185020Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.9672203,-92.3450012
116A56BN111956AR00711Newtonia3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.24,-94.136
116A56BN141956AR00714Newtonia3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.185,-94.496
116A56BN151956AR00715Newtonia3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.397,-94.601
116A62WS091962AR14309Newtonia3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.0908672,-94.2212276
116A62WS101962AR14310Newtonia3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.0499709,-94.2759583
116A65BN011965AR00701Newtonia3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.3917,-94.5994
116AM06185012006MO185001NEWTONIA4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.0014056,-93.8173222
116B81P06771981MO145001Newtonia3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.8666649,-94.1666641
116B81P06781981MO145002Newtonia3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.872776,-94.1919479
116BM94097191994MO097019Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.3376306,-94.2696889
116BM94097371994MO097037Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.3157444,-94.3011917
116BM97097041997MO097004Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.1212028,-94.1574111
116BM97097281997MO097028Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.1000972,-94.1625472
116BM98097011998MO097001Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.1286583,-94.1765944
116BM99097021999MO097002Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.2794556,-94.1491917
116BM99097101999MO097010Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.2136806,-94.2188556
116BM05109292005MO109029Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.9627861,-94.0261306
116BM05145012005MO145001Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.876825,-94.1788333
116BM05145022005MO145002Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.8628833,-94.1655611
116BM06077152006MO077015Newtonia4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.3082722,-93.2539611
n/a40A2676S1971MO077001Newtonia3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the NEWTONIA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the NEWTONIA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NEWTONIA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NEWTONIA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with NEWTONIA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NEWTONIA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NEWTONIA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with NEWTONIA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OK-2012-02-16-07 | Cherokee and Delaware Counties - December 1970

    Major soils in soil association 2 and their relation to the landscape (Soil Survey of Cherokee and Delaware Counties, Oklahoma; December 1970).

  2. OK-2012-02-16-54 | Kay County - December 1967

    Relationship of soils in the Bluestem Hills. Soil association 8 (Soil Survey of Kay County, Oklahoma; December 1967).

  3. OK-2012-02-17-44 | Rogers County - August 1966

    General locations of soil associations 3 and 5 in a landscape that is typical of the central and eastern parts of Rogers County (Soil Survey of Rogers County, Oklahoma; August 1966).

Map Units

Map units containing NEWTONIA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesNeB28685650412th3mar00719731:20000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes8838950145334230yr3ks04919841:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes8837585145368330wz7ks07319811:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes7015550725342432th3mmo01119691:24000
Newtonia-Eldorado silt loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes400194525323312qnwvmo01119691:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes70155572225342462th3mmo07719791:24000
Newtonia silt loam, karst, 1 to 3 percent slopes70160166186206720hmpmo07719791:24000
Newtonia-Eldorado silt loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes400195309425323302qnwvmo09720001:24000
Newtonia-Eldorado silt loams, 1 to 3 percent slopes, moderately eroded400206281057123k02mo09720001:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes7015526025342442th3mmo09720001:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes70155133825342422th3mmo10919791:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes70155273825342452th3mmo14519841:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesNaB83095718202th3mok02119671:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesNaC23105718212th3pok02119671:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedNaC2601571822m60wok02119671:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes377416571228m5dqok02319771:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesNaB37945718632th3mok04119671:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesNaA3095571862m625ok04119671:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesNaC955718642th3pok04119671:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesNeB1650571164m5bnok08919701:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesNaB38041066353kyvok11519611:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedNaC28051066372tgv5ok11519611:24000
Newtonia-Shidler complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesNs7601066383kyyok11519611:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesNaC5941066362tgv4ok11519611:24000
Newtonia-Catoosa complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes261456384812dxf9ok13319761:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes3237661067143l1dok14319751:12000
Newtonia silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes3317111067152tgv4ok14319751:12000
Newtonia silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesNeC48331067772tgv4ok14519721:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesNeB19541067763l3dok14519721:24000
Newtonia silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedNeC211191067782tgv5ok14519721:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the NEWTONIA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .