Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the NEWTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of NEWTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to NEWTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
111CWH74021974IN181002Newton3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.8580972,-86.6595917
17UCD565200156-CA-52-001NEWTON3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.183075,-122.5251007
17UCD724517572-CA-45-175xNEWTON3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.4050789,-122.409111
98FU80171980IN049017Newton3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.1473389,-86.3943722
98JR80171980IN073017Newton3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.1718333,-86.95205
98NW85281985IN111028Newton1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.0568972,-87.4095222
9840A1951S1968MI139001Newton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.9669495,-86.0849609
9896P0065S1995IN073002Newton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.1552773,-86.9863892
9896P0066S1995IN073003Newton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.1530571,-86.9844437
9808N0078S2007MI139011Newton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.9786682,-86.184166

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the NEWTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the NEWTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NEWTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NEWTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with NEWTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NEWTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NEWTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with NEWTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. IN-2010-09-02-02 | Pulaski County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Oakville-Denham-Brems association (Soil Survey of Pulaski County, Indiana; 2003).

  2. IN-2010-09-02-03 | Pulaski County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Maumee-Morocco-Newton association (Soil Survey of Pulaski County, Indiana; 2003).

  3. IN-2010-09-02-04 | Pulaski County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Houghton-Adrian-Toto association (Soil Survey of Pulaski County, Indiana; 2003).

  4. IN-2010-09-02-08 | Pulaski County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Gilford-Brady-Granby association (Soil Survey of Pulaski County, Indiana; 2003).

  5. IN-2012-01-19-43 | Pulaski County - January 1968

    Topographical relationships between the soils on sand ridges, in depressional outwash areas, and in organic deposits (Soil Survey of Pulaski County, Indiana; 1968).

  6. MI-2012-02-06-06 | Allegan County - March 1987

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Oakville association (Soil Survey of Allegan County, Michigan; March 1987).

  7. TX-2010-11-02-30 | Colorado County - 2006

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Straber-Tremona-Lufkin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Colorado County, Texas; 2006).

Map Units

Map units containing NEWTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Newton fine sandy loamNe25921625845g5nin04919841:15840
Newton loamy fine sand, undrainedNe19111613705dxhin07319851:15840
Newton loamy fine sandNf206927267794r1in09119791:15840
Newton loamy fine sand, 0 to 1 percent slopesNoeA151524873342ph8lin09919781:15840
Newton loamy fine sand, undrainedNw14981636785h9yin11119901:15840
Newton loamy fine sandNf11931606695d5win12719781:15840
Newton-Morocco loamy fine sands, 0 to 1 percent slopesNofA1062618496466glin13120011:12000
Newton loamy sandNf51411626225g6win14919801:15840
Morocco-Newton complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes15B8728212438741vmi00519841:15840
Newton mucky fine sand694004212486743dmi00519841:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the NEWTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .