Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the NET soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of NET, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to NET were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the NET soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the NET series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with NET share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with NET, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MI-2010-09-07-17 | Marquette County - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Keewaydin-Michigamme-Rock outcrop association (Soil Survey of Marquette County, Michigan; 2007).

  2. MI-2012-02-06-20 | Houghton County Area - October 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Trimountain-Paavola-Net association (Soil Survey of Houghton County Area, Michigan; October 1991).

  3. MI-2012-02-06-29 | Iron County - October 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Wabeno association (Soil Survey of Iron County, Michigan; October 1997).

  4. MI-2012-02-06-30 | Iron County - October 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Peavy association (Soil Survey of Iron County, Michigan; October 1997).

Map Units

Map units containing NET as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Champion-Net complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes66B14916415007fxvbmi01319841:20000
Champion-Net-Michigamme complex, rocky, 0 to 8 percent slopes108B4930414927fxrrmi01319841:20000
Net-Witbeck complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes86A4614415031fxw3mi01319841:20000
Net silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, stony25A3478414962fxswmi01319841:20000
Witbeck-Cathro-Net complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, extremely stony808739524418852myzhmi01319841:20000
Net loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes32A100314560241kw3jmi05320071:24000
Montreal-Net complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes103B7682416036fyxjmi06119891:20000
Net-Witbeck complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes102A4834416035fyxhmi06119891:20000
Net-Witbeck complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rocky119A1660416056fyy5mi06119891:20000
Net stony fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes101A798416034fyxgmi06119891:20000
Michigamme-Net complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, rocky136B687416075fyysmi06119891:20000
Witbeck-Cathro-Net complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, extremely stony808716924836662pcg8mi06119891:20000
Champion-Net complex, 0-6 percent slopes8088A8424861752pg26mi06119891:20000
Champion-Net very fine sandy loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes, very stony111B12534415873fyr8mi07119921:20000
Net-Witbeck complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, very stony68B12445416007fywlmi07119921:20000
Net loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes32A825224525172nb1gmi07119921:20000
Wabeno-Net silt loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes, very stony124B6781415888fyrrmi07119921:20000
Wabeno-Net silt loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rocky, very stony125B1941415889fyrsmi07119921:20000
Champion-Net complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes66B1624786032p65ymi07119921:20000
Witbeck-Cathro-Net complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, extremely stony8087224785772p653mi07119921:20000
Witbeck-Net complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, extremely bouldery135A2063395047f82gmi10319991:24000
Net cobbly very fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, very stony36A553395197f879mi10319991:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the NET soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .