Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the NESDA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of NESDA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to NESDA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the NESDA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the NESDA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NESDA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NESDA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with NESDA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NESDA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NESDA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with NESDA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing NESDA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Nesda, occasionally flooded-Birchfield-Soapcreek, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes105B26946671ndrymt02719791:24000
Nesda-Sudworth complex, occasionally flooded1786383342410ch9hmt02719791:24000
Sudworth-Nesda loams2133701342450chbsmt02719791:24000
Enbar-Nesda loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes832535342587chh6mt02719791:24000
Nesda variant complex1771485342409ch9gmt02719791:24000
Nesda complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes832A343344083ck1gmt04119941:24000
Enbar-Nesda loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes491B1326344214ck5pmt05119921:24000
Nesda gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes100129344776ckrtmt07919861:24000
Nesda complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes871B206345295cl9kmt10119921:24000
Nesda-McIlwaine complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesNeA211473984ycsmt60219631:20000
Straw and Nesda soils, channeled11810207346265cm9vmt60819761:24000
Korent-Nesda complex, occasionally flooded751265346531cmlfmt60819761:24000
Nesda-McIlwaine complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes130A3547346594cmngmt61519921:24000
McIlwaine-Nesda-Straw complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes180A1755346612cmp1mt61519921:24000
Sudworth-Nesda loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes407A498015545956rtmt62219971:24000
Nesda loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes207B23415531756m7mt62219971:24000
Nesda, occasionally flooded-Meadowcreek, rarely flooded-McIlwaine, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes600B4159190222521vf3mt62420211:24000
Nesda-Meadowcreek complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, rarely flooded613B268026102452r8czmt62420211:24000
Nesda, occasionally flooded-Birchfield-Soapcreek, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes105B207225232391ndrymt62420211:24000
Nesda-Meadowcreek-Clunton complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded413B102519125652265nmt62420211:24000
Enbar-Nesda complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded183A29325232371ndsxmt62420211:24000
Meadowcreek, rarely flooded-Nesda, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes412A16619125952266mmt62420211:24000
Nesda-Meadowcreek complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, rarely flooded19C5429796402pg60mt62420211:24000
Nesda-Meadowcreek complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, rarely flooded19C28724862932pg60mt6321:24000
Nesda-Meadowcreek complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded6A14425128844z2bmt6321:24000
Nesda-Meadowcreek complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes19C2658185869720d3zmt63720141:24000
Nesda-Meadowcreek complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded6A19761480664z2bmt63720141:24000
Nesda-Meadowcreek-Clunton complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes413B74824871072ph18mt63720141:24000
Nesda, occasionally flooded-Meadowcreek, rarely flooded-McIlwaine, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes600B490251734721vf3mt63720141:24000
Fairsmith-Nesda complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes502A3731480414z1jmt63720141:24000
Nesda-McIlwaine loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes107A970214960050ntmt63920001:24000
Meadowcreek-Nesda loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes109A736914960250nwmt63920001:24000
Nesda-Meadowcreek-Clunton loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes100B193014959250nkmt63920001:24000
Bowery-Nesda-Bonebasin complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes400D690149961511gmt63920001:24000
Nesda complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes190B674347619cnqjmt64119941:24000
Lolo and Nesda soils, flooded388731348169cp98mt65519751:24000
Nesda-McIlwaine loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes1107A7361442d43fmt65519751:24000
Ridgelawn-Nesda-Korchea complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded308A5910348556cpprmt65719901:24000
Nesda, occasionally flooded-Riverwash complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes109B499348294cpf9mt65719901:24000
Enbar-Nesda complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded183A33615316451ndsxmt66620081:24000
Nesda, occasionally flooded-Birchfield-Soapcreek, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes105B9115316151ndrymt66620081:24000
Meadowcreek, rarely flooded-Nesda-Clunton, rarely flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes655B5418156946589smt6691:24000
Nesda loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded600B1512156941589mmt6691:24000
Meadowcreek, rarely flooded-Nesda complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes155A630156848586mmt6691:24000
Meadowcreek, rarely flooded-Fairway, rarely flooded-Nesda complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes503B3301569295897mt6691:24000
Nesda, occasionally flooded,-Meadowcreek, rarely flooded-Clunton, frequently flooded complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes100B88620187ntc1mt6691:24000
Meadowcreek-Nesda loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes109A84620188ntc2mt6691:24000
Clark Fork-Nesda-Elliston complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded112331369162ypqnwy6291:24000
Nesda stony silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes1852938361173d3trwy63319871:24000
Nesda variant-Havertel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes1871797361171d3tpwy63319871:24000
Nesda-Rubble land complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes186586361172d3tqwy63319871:24000
Nesda-Dalecreek complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded980192415292161nb8kwy71920131:24000
Nesda very fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded6261863185674320b2ywy71920131:24000
Nesda-Rubble land complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded96445415414401nqzwwy71920131:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the NESDA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .