Soil Data Explorer - NEELEY

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the NEELEY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of NEELEY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to NEELEY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
11	40A1121	S1958ID077004	Neeley	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	42.8807411,-113.1466904
11	40A1120	S1958ID077015	Neeley	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	42.8829651,-113.135582

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the NEELEY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the NEELEY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NEELEY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NEELEY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with NEELEY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the NEELEY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the NEELEY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with NEELEY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing NEELEY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Neeley silt loam, 4 to 12 percent slopes	38	5670	82371	2rq4	id707	1976	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes	40	24964	82616	2rz1	id709	1976	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes	45	8171	82621	2rz6	id709	1976	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes	41	6076	82617	2rz2	id709	1976	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 4 to 12 percent slopes	44	5675	82620	2rz5	id709	1976	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes	46	3270	82622	2rz7	id709	1976	1:24000
Neeley-Hodad complex, 2 to 4 percent slopes	47	3140	82623	2rz8	id709	1976	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes	43	2331	82619	2rz4	id709	1976	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes	42	814	82618	2rz3	id709	1976	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	39	663	82614	2ryz	id709	1976	1:24000
Neeley-Hodad complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes	48	633	82624	2rz9	id709	1976	1:24000
Neeley-Hodad complex, 8 to 12 percent slopes	49	538	82625	2rzb	id709	1976	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, rolling	NLF	47852	82753	2s3g	id710	1968	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 4 to 12 percent slopes	NLC	6706	82751	2s3d	id710	1968	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes	NLB	1959	82750	2s3c	id710	1968	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, steep	NLG	1778	82754	2s3h	id710	1968	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes	NLE	1192	82752	2s3f	id710	1968	1:24000
Neeley silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes	81	2311	485679	j9d2	id715	1994	1:24000
Neeley-Hodad complex, 2 to 4 percent slopes	51	12	1531623	1nds6	id780	1998	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the NEELEY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).