Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the NATCHEZ soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of NATCHEZ, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to NATCHEZ were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
115BM05201022005MO201002Natchez4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.1355362,-89.5044022

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the NATCHEZ soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the NATCHEZ series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NATCHEZ series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NATCHEZ series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with NATCHEZ share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NATCHEZ series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NATCHEZ series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with NATCHEZ, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MS-2010-09-08-03 | Holmes County -

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Memphis-Natchez-Loring general soil map unit.

  2. MS-2012-02-06-04 | Carroll County - May 1990

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Memphis-Loring-Natchez general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Carroll County, Mississippi; May 1990).

  3. MS-2012-02-06-06 | Carroll County - May 1990

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Natchez-Memphis-Saffell general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Carroll County, Mississippi; May 1990).

  4. MS-2012-02-06-13 | Tate County - March 1967

    Distribution of soils in the Natchez-Memphis soil association (Soil Survey of Tate County, Mississippi; March 1967).

Map Units

Map units containing NATCHEZ as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Natchez silt loam, 20 to 40 percent slopesNaF1080564102lxzvar07719741:20000
Natchez silt loam, 20 to 40 percent slopesNaE4180564246ly4har10719711:20000
Memphis-Natchez complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, gulliedMmF2310654194pyr1ky07520021:12000
Feliciana and Natchez silt loams, 8 to 60 percent slopesFH492116052632tpnnla03719921:24000
Feliciana and Natchez silt loams, 8 to 60 percent slopesFH5143217255972tpnnla12520021:24000
Gullied land-Natchez complex, 17 to 60 percent slopesGxF15756567412m1fmms00119661:15840
Memphis-Natchez complex, 17 to 60 percent slopesMnF10332567423m1fzms00119661:15840
Memphis-Natchez association, 12 to 50 percent slopes7F201005675652ssc8ms01519851:20000
Natchez-Saffell association, hilly60F13254567556m1l8ms01519851:20000
Memphis and Natchez silt loams, 17 to 40 percent slopes, severely erodedMnF355277567607m1mxms02119611:20000
Memphis and Natchez silt loams, 17 to 40 percent slopes, erodedMnF2408185676062ssc9ms02119611:20000
Memphis and Natchez silt loams, 8 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedMnD373895676032ssccms02119611:20000
Memphis and Natchez silt loams, 12 to 17 percent slopes, severely erodedMnE350435676052sscbms02119611:20000
Memphis and Natchez silt loams, 12 to 17 percent slopes, erodedMnE21455567604m1mtms02119611:20000
Memphis and Natchez silt loams, 8 to 12 percent slopes, eroded (memphis and memphis)MnD2420567602m1mrms02119611:20000
Natchez silt loam, steep phaseNa1947567781m1tjms03319551:24000
Memphis-Natchez-Riedtown association, hillyMN35635567917m1yxms04919761:20000
Memphis-Natchez association, 12 to 50 percent slopesMN328045679722ssc8ms05119971:20000
Saffell-Natchez complex, 12 to 50 percent slopesSf1955567990m218ms05119971:20000
Memphis-Natchez association, 12 to 50 percent slopesMN745275680842ssc8ms06319761:20000
Memphis, Natchez, and Guin soils, 17 to 40 percent slopes, eroded (memphis, natchez, saffell)MnF27258568343m2dnms10719611:24000
Memphis-Natchez complex, 17 to 40 percent slopesMnF3610568544m2m4ms13519661:24000
Natchez-Memphis silt loams, 17 to 50 percent slopesNmF2442568597m2nvms13719641:15840
Natchez-Memphis silt loams, 12 to 17 percent slopesNmE279568596m2ntms13719641:15840
Memphis and Natchez silt loams, 17 to 40 percent slopes, erodedMnF21025065687082ssc9ms14919621:15840
Memphis and Natchez silt loams, 8 to 12 percent slopes, severely erodedMnD338635687062ssccms14919621:15840
Memphis and Natchez silt loams, 12 to 17 percent slopes, severely erodedMnE329595687072sscbms14919621:15840
Natchez-Memphis silt loams, 15 to 60 percent slopes, severely eroded16F322623571065m57gms15720061:24000
Fortadams-Natchez silt loams, 20 to 90 percent slopes, severely eroded9F312299571043m56rms15720061:24000
Memphis-Natchez association, 12 to 50 percent slopesMNE1194835688012ssc8ms16319691:20000
Natchez silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes, gulliedNaF2025567354m1crtn16719891:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the NATCHEZ soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .