Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the NAPIER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of NAPIER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to NAPIER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
107BM91087591991MO087059mNapier3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.086967,-95.2069303
107BM04087012004MO087001NAPIER4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.9255556,-95.0997222
107B40A1440S1958IA085006NAPIER5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.7344437,-95.7883301
107B40A1441S1958IA085009Napier5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.7458344,-95.7886124
107B80P0116S1979MO095004Napier7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.1333694,-94.1835632
107B96P0051S1995IA047003Napier7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.0658073,-95.6683731
107B97P0031S1996IA193027Napier7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.3711662,-96.1333084

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the NAPIER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the NAPIER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NAPIER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NAPIER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with NAPIER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the NAPIER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the NAPIER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with NAPIER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. IA-2010-09-02-26 | Monona County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Ida-Castana-Hamburg association (Soil Survey of Monona County, Iowa; 2003).

  2. IA-2010-09-02-27 | Monona County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Monona-Ida-Napier association (Soil Survey of Monona County, Iowa; 2003).

  3. IA-2010-09-03-07 | Woodbury - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Ida-Napier-Monona association (Soil Survey of Woodbury County, Iowa; 2006).

  4. IA-2010-09-09-14 | Crawford County - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Monona-Ida-Napier association (Soil Survey of Crawford County, Iowa; 2007).

  5. IA-2010-09-09-17 | Crawford County - 2007

    A cross section showing the relationship between soils and parent material in the western part of Crawford County (Soil Survey of Crawford County, Iowa; 2007).

  6. IA-2010-09-24-01 | Pottawattamie County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the deep Loess region of western Iowa (Soil Survey of Pottawattamie County, Iowa; 1998).

  7. MO-2010-09-08-04 | Holt County - 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Monona-Timula-Contrary association (Soil Survey of Holt County, Missouri; 1997).

  8. MO-2012-02-06-02 | Atchison County - May 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Dockery-Napier association (Soil Survey of Atchison County, Missouri; May 1994).

  9. MO-2012-02-06-03 | Atchison County - May 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Monona-Ida association (Soil Survey of Atchison County, Missouri; May 1994).

Map Units

Map units containing NAPIER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Napier-Kennebec-Colo complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes17B77453997962wnylia04720041:12000
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes12B74903997912sy76ia04720041:12000
Napier silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes12C72993997922sy78ia04720041:12000
Napier-Gullied land complex, 5 to 14 percent slopes717D9563998492sy7dia04720041:12000
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes12B151394060912sy76ia07119681:20000
Napier-Gullied land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes717C45134061652sy7cia07119681:20000
Napier silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes12C9724060922sy78ia07119681:20000
Napier silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes12C355464067282sy78ia08519711:15840
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes12B328674067262sy76ia08519711:15840
Napier silt loam, 9 to 14 percent slopes12D73434067292sy79ia08519711:15840
Napier-Nodaway-Colo complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes17B27024067392y6b1ia08519711:15840
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, overwash12B+17644067272sy77ia08519711:15840
Napier-Gullied land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes717C7784067852sy7cia08519711:15840
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes12B226294095322sy76ia12919791:15840
Napier-Gullied land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes71736214095922sy7cia12919791:15840
Napier silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes12C15764095332sy78ia12919791:15840
Napier silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes12C349564473122sy78ia13319941:12000
Napier silt loam, 9 to 14 percent slopes12D169384473132sy79ia13319941:12000
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes12B89974473112sy76ia13319941:12000
Napier-Kennebec-Colo complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes17B24804473142wnylia13319941:12000
Napier-Gullied land complex, 5 to 14 percent slopes717D18674473892sy7dia13319941:12000
Napier silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes12C64444103192sy78ia14919721:20000
Napier-Castana silt loams, 9 to 14 percent slopes170D49914103252xblnia14919721:20000
Napier-Gullied land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes717C8174103572sy7cia14919721:20000
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes12B433564104382sy76ia15519861:15840
Napier silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes12C135424104392sy78ia15519861:15840
Napier silt loam, 9 to 14 percent slopes12D13114104402sy79ia15519861:15840
Napier-Gullied land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes717C5434105122sy7cia15519861:15840
Napier-Urban land complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes4012B5304104832sy7gia15519861:15840
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes12B6206267192sy76ia16520051:12000
Napier silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes12C2956267212sy78ia16520051:12000
Napier silt loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes12C298464018372sy78ia19320031:12000
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes12B103754018362sy76ia19320031:12000
Napier-Rawles complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes47B9602401924fh79ia19320031:12000
Napier-Castana silt loams, 9 to 20 percent slopes170E70467416252xblpia19320031:12000
Napier-Gullied land complex, 5 to 14 percent slopes717D29194019592sy7dia19320031:12000
Napier-Urban land complex, 5 to 9 percent slopes4012C21154021332sy7hia19320031:12000
Napier-Urban land complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes4012B9844019172sy7gia19320031:12000
Napier-Castana-Urban land complex, 9 to 14 percent slopes4170D2284021352xblqia19320031:12000
Napier-Kennebec-Colo complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes17B914021312wnylia19320031:12000
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes13560731025284272sy76mo00519881:24000
Napier-Gullied land complex, 5 to 14 percent slopes13628320826718442qhz6mo00519881:24000
Gullied land-Napier complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes1016815119026922y6b0mo00519881:24000
Napier-Gullied land complex, 5 to 14 percent slopes13628764326718452qhz6mo08719921:24000
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes13560265825284262sy76mo08719921:24000
Motark-Napier silt loams, 1 to 7 percent slopes135551492902767z9djmo08719921:24000
Napier-Gullied land complex, 1 to 7 percent slopes135626879027712sy7bmo08719921:24000
Napier silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes135619148871442sy76mo08919751:24000
Napier silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes125031923886672yrnbmo09519821:24000
Napier-Nodaway-Gullied land complex, 0 to 60 percent slopes81081222166882wnyhne02119781:20000
Napier silt loam, 11 to 17 percent slopes81064454426755gb29ne04319721:20000
Napier-Gullied land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes810710844267562sy7cne04319721:20000
Napier-Nodaway-Gullied land complex, 0 to 60 percent slopes810819183955342wnyhne17720001:12000
Gullied land-Napier complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes99329423955192sy7fne17720001:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the NAPIER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .