Soil Data Explorer - MUSICK

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MUSICK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MUSICK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MUSICK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
22A	UCD5610004	56-CA-10-004	MUSICK	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	37.0607719,-119.3766251
22A	UCD5810001	58-CA-10-001	MUSICK	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	37.0318871,-119.2689438
22A	UCD6705028	67-CA-05-028x	Musick	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.4112133,-120.5629691
22A	UCD6705030	67-CA-05-030x	Musick	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.3665081,-120.5588708
22A	UCD7755045	77-CA-55-045x	Musick	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.0492787,-120.2075436
22A	UCD7755046	77-CA-55-046x	Musick	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	37.9831146,-120.2334542
22A	91P0725	90CA109107	Musick	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	37.9000015,-120.026947
22A	92P0424	92CA043102	Musick	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	37.4382667541504,-119.689865112305
22A	94P0344	94CA019006	Musick	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	37.0749397277832,-119.375961303711
22A	40A2902	S1959CA005013	Musick	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.4080544,-120.6147232
22A	40A2903	S1959CA005014	Musick	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.4505539,-120.5774994
22A	40A3397	S1977CA019003	MUSICK	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	37.0666656,-119.3499985
n/a	84P0458	83CA019302	Musick	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MUSICK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MUSICK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the MUSICK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the MUSICK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MUSICK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the MUSICK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the MUSICK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MUSICK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing MUSICK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Hoda-Musick complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes	159	2835	460466	hg4r	ca618	1991	1:24000
Hoda-Musick complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes	160	455	460467	hg4s	ca618	1991	1:24000
Musick sandy loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes	MrE	7700	460234	hfx8	ca619	1970	1:24000
Musick sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	MrC	2495	460233	hfx7	ca619	1970	1:24000
Musick-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 50 percent slopes	MsE	1877	460235	hfx9	ca619	1970	1:24000
Musick very rocky sandy loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes	MtE	3183	462265	hj0s	ca624	1968	1:20000
Musick sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes	MrD	2296	462263	hj0q	ca624	1968	1:20000
Musick sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes	MrC	2061	462262	hj0p	ca624	1968	1:20000
Musick rocky sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes	MsC	710	462264	hj0r	ca624	1968	1:20000
Musick very rocky sandy loam, 16 to 51 percent slopes	MvE	3212	462419	hj5r	ca628	1963	1:20000
Musick very rocky sandy loam, 51 to 71 percent slopes	MvF	1578	462420	hj5s	ca628	1963	1:20000
Musick very rocky sandy loam, 9 to 16 percent slopes	MvC	775	462418	hj5q	ca628	1963	1:20000
Musick moderately deep-Rock outcrop complex, 51 to 71 percent slopes	MxF	572	462423	hj5w	ca628	1963	1:20000
Musick very rocky sandy loam, moderately deep, 51 to 71 percent slopes	MwF	434	462422	hj5v	ca628	1963	1:20000
Musick sandy loam, 31 to 51 percent slopes	MuE	320	462417	hj5p	ca628	1963	1:20000
Musick very rocky sandy loam, moderately deep, 16 to 51 percent slopes	MwE	308	462421	hj5t	ca628	1963	1:20000
Musick sandy loam, 9 to 16 percent slopes	MuC	184	462415	hj5m	ca628	1963	1:20000
Musick sandy loam, 3 to 9 percent slopes	MuB	147	462414	hj5l	ca628	1963	1:20000
Musick sandy loam, 16 to 31 percent slopes	MuD	130	462416	hj5n	ca628	1963	1:20000
Musick-Hotaw complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes	6206	13338	3356289	30t4v	ca630	2018	1:24000
Musick-Hotaw-Chawanakee complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes	6207	7081	3356290	30t4w	ca630	2018	1:24000
Musick-Wukusick complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, low precipitation	6036	4475	2924831	2x4cr	ca630	2018	1:24000
Musick-Ultic Haploxeralfs, moderately well drained, complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes	6202	3110	2403747	2lp97	ca630	2018	1:24000
Musick fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	6205	2346	3356288	30t4t	ca630	2018	1:24000
Musick-Wukusick complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes	6037	2101	1913592	2277s	ca630	2018	1:24000
Musick-Wukusick complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes, low precipitation	6038	2078	1900697	21stt	ca630	2018	1:24000
Musick-Wukusick complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes, low precipitation	6033	910	2924832	2x4cn	ca630	2018	1:24000
Urban land-Musick-Hotaw complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes	9014	658	2424975	2mdd0	ca630	2018	1:24000
Musick-Wukusick complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes	6034	651	1913591	2277r	ca630	2018	1:24000
Musick-Hotaw complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes	6206	6576	3356278	30t4v	ca649	1967	1:24000
Musick-Hotaw-Chawanakee complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes	6207	3389	3356279	30t4w	ca649	1967	1:24000
Musick fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	6205	1034	3356277	30t4t	ca649	1967	1:24000
Hoda-Musick complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes	HOF	280	464680	hljp	ca719	1982	1:24000
Hoda-Musick complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes	HOE	258	464679	hljn	ca719	1982	1:24000
Holland-Musick loams, 30 to 50 percent slopes complex	147	3749	464897	hlrp	ca724	1985	1:24000
Holland-Musick loams, 5 to 30 percent slopes complex	146	1915	464896	hlrn	ca724	1985	1:24000
Bighill-Musick complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes	104	415	464854	hlq9	ca724	1985	1:24000
Musick-Wukusick complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes	6037	994	3115251	2277s	ca731	1981	1:24000
Musick-Wukusick complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes, low precipitation	6038	755	2925024	21stt	ca731	1981	1:24000
Musick-Wukusick complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes	6034	153	2925022	2277r	ca731	1981	1:24000
Musick-Hotaw complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes	6206	113	3356280	30t4v	ca731	1981	1:24000
Musick-Wukusick complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, low precipitation	6036	87	2925023	2x4cr	ca731	1981	1:24000
Musick-Wukusick complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes, low precipitation	6033	31	2925021	2x4cn	ca731	1981	1:24000
Musick-Ultic Haploxeralfs, moderately well drained, complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes	6202	2	2925027	2lp97	ca731	1981	1:24000
Musick-Hotaw-Chawanakee complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes	6207	1	3356281	30t4w	ca731	1981	1:24000
Musick-Hotaw complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes	6206	1258	3356284	30t4v	ca750	1983	1:24000
Musick-Hotaw-Chawanakee complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes	6207	562	3356285	30t4w	ca750	1983	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MUSICK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).