Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MUSELLA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MUSELLA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MUSELLA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MUSELLA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MUSELLA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MUSELLA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MUSELLA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MUSELLA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MUSELLA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MUSELLA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MUSELLA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing MUSELLA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Lloyd-Agricola-Musella complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedLdD254616118091r36vga01520131:12000
Agricola-Lloyd-Musella complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedAaE246616118101r36wga01520131:12000
Lloyd-Agricola-Musella complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately erodedLdC245016118081r36tga01520131:12000
Lloyd-Agricola-Musella complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedLdB21216118061r36rga01520131:12000
Musella and Pacolet stony soils, 10 to 45 percent slopesMJF6439124209457rga06719691:15840
Musella gravelly soils, 6 to 15 percent slopes, erodedMlD22135124213457wga06719691:15840
Musella gravelly soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely erodedMlE31001124214457xga06719691:15840
Musella clay loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes, erodedMvD2327124266459lga08919791:15840
Musella stony sandy clay loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesMwF281124269459pga08919791:15840
Musella stony sandy clay loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesMwD277124268459nga08919791:15840
Musella clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, erodedMvE2129124267459mga08919791:15840
Musella stony fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesMFE193012626347d0ga09719601:15840
Musella clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, erodedMvD281012628247dmga09719601:15840
Musella clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, erodedMvC274512628147dlga09719601:15840
Musella clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, erodedMvE274012628347dnga09719601:15840
Musella stony clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, erodedMwD234012628547dqga09719601:15840
Musella stony clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, erodedMwE214512628647drga09719601:15840
Musella stony clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, erodedMwC212512628447dpga09719601:15840
Musella cobbly loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesMCF1930639964pgy0ga13519661:15840
Musella cobbly loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesMCD1510639963pgxzga13519661:15840
Musella stony clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, erodedMwE286512454045lfga13719601:20000
Musella stony clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, severely erodedMwD36512453945ldga13719601:20000
Musella clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, erodedMvD253512473745ssga19919601:15840
Musella and Wilkes stony soils, 15 to 40 percent slopes, erodedMEF250512472545sdga19919601:15840
Musella clay loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes, severely erodedMvC335512473645srga19919601:15840
Musella clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, severely erodedMvD326512473845stga19919601:15840
Lloyd-Agricola-Musella complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately erodedLdD289952511189trwtga22320101:12000
Lloyd-Agricola-Musella complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately erodedLdC270652511188trwsga22320101:12000
Agricola-Lloyd-Musella complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately erodedAaE2607525112121tjqqga22320101:12000
Lloyd-Agricola-Musella complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedLdB2196025112822p6xtga22320101:12000
Agricola-Lloyd-Musella complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes, stony, moderately erodedAcF2155525112322lnjfga22320101:12000
Musella-Gwinnett stony complex, 10 to 25 percent slopesMFE166512527446c3ga60519671:15840
Musella and Gwinnett stony soils, 25 to 60 percent slopesMGF133012527546c4ga60519671:15840
Musella cobbly clay loam, 15 to 35 percent slopesMuF1034512532746dtga60619731:20000
Musella cobbly clay loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesMuD201012532646dsga60619731:20000
Musella gravelly clay loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes, erodedMuD2179012545746k0ga61819661:15840
Musella stony clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, erodedMwE2161512545846k1ga61819661:15840
Musella cobbly loam, 10 to 25 percent slopesMCE4645531347ktx7ga62219671:20000
Musella clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, erodedMvE2130012549946lcga62319651:15840
Musella stony clay loam, 10 to 25 percent slopesMwE439512562146q9ga62919761:20000
Musella clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, erodedMvC252012562046q8ga62919761:20000
Musella cobbly loam, 25 to 70 percent slopesMCG1210012567546s1ga63219671:15840
Musella cobbly loam, 6 to 25 percent slopesMCE611512567446s0ga63219671:15840
Musella gravelly clay loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes, erodedMuE2338512568046s6ga63219671:15840
Musella soils, 40 to 80 percent slopesMuG6511310534dcjsc07719671:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MUSELLA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .