Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MULHALL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MULHALL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MULHALL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
80A79-OK-60-279-OK119-60-2Mulhall4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.1266111,-96.6445028
80A91P0873S1991OK083002Mulhall6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.0291672,-97.4466629
80A91P0877S1991OK083006Mulhall7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.1566658,-97.4375

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MULHALL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MULHALL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MULHALL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MULHALL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MULHALL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MULHALL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MULHALL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MULHALL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OK-2010-09-29-06 | Logan County - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Coyle-Ironmound-Zaneis general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Logan County, Oklahoma; 2006).

  2. OK-2010-09-29-07 | Noble County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Grainola-Lucien-Masham general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Noble County, Oklahoma; 2005).

  3. OK-2012-02-17-27 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Renfrow-Coyle-Grainola map unit (Soil Survey of Payne County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

Map Units

Map units containing MULHALL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Mulhall loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMulC86234802rj9nok07119651:24000
Mulhall loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMulC32713836522rj9nok08319941:12000
Mulhall loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedMulC2817383653dw6xok08319941:12000
Grainola-Ashport frequently flooded-Mulhall complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesGAMD2114319073752zh6vok10319941:24000
Mulhall loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMulC42213840892rj9nok10319941:24000
Mulhall loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, gulliedMulD41500384091dwp1ok10319941:24000
Mulhall loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesMulD1416384090dwp0ok10319941:24000
Grainola-Ashport frequently flooded-Mulhall complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesGAMD1110416759482zh6vok11720071:24000
Mulhall loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMulC344514231622rj9nok11720071:24000
Mulhall-Gullied land complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesMuGD4181714231641jrxjok11720071:24000
Mulhall loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedMulC2130814129871jfb7ok11720071:24000
Mulhall loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesMulD79216773271t9dbok11720071:24000
Grainola-Ashport frequently flooded-Mulhall complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesGAMD132343845382zh6vok11919831:24000
Mulhall loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, gullied626829384562dx57ok11919831:24000
Mulhall loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMulC471019076472rj9nok11919831:24000
Mulhall loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded613293384561dx56ok11919831:24000
Mulhall-Agra complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes, gullied5022653845492y2sbok11919831:24000
Seminole, Chickasha, and Mulhall soils, 3 to 8 percent slopes, severely eroded3934796384826dxfrok13319761:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MULHALL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .