Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MOSMAN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MOSMAN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MOSMAN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
22082P054681AK280002Mosman5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties56.211113,-132.6980591
n/a82P054781AK280003Mosman5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties56.2097206,-132.6972198

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MOSMAN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance bar figure.



There are insufficient data to create the water balance line figure.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MOSMAN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MOSMAN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MOSMAN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MOSMAN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MOSMAN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MOSMAN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MOSMAN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing MOSMAN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Kupreanof-Mosman complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes16D167725494671ngqak64519921:31680
Mitkof-Mosman complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes34D79097494931nhkak64519921:31680
Mosman very gravelly loam, 75 to 120 percent slopes33F68453494911nhhak64519921:31680
Mosman very gravelly loam, 35 to 75 percent slopes33D50137494901nhgak64519921:31680
Mitkof-Mosman complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes34B47643494921nhjak64519921:31680
Mosman-Kupreanof complex, 75 to 110 percent slopes16F44831494681ngrak64519921:31680
Kupreanof-Mosman complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes16B30283494661ngpak64519921:31680
Mosman-Rock outcrop complex, 75 to 120 percent slopes38F21290495021nhvak64519921:31680
Mosman-Typic Cryumbrepts, loamy-skeletal complex, 75 to 120 percent slopes20F19936494741ngyak64519921:31680
Mosman-McGilvery complex, 75 to 120 percent slopes28F10214494811nh5ak64519921:31680
Mosman-Mitkof complex, 75 to 100 percent slopes34F8742494941nhlak64519921:31680
Mosman-Typic Cryumbrepts, loamy-skeletal complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes20D6732494731ngxak64519921:31680
Mosman very gravelly loam, 5 to 35 percent slopes33B6358494891nhfak64519921:31680
Mosman-McGilvery complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes28D5701494801nh4ak64519921:31680
Maybeso-Mosman complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes35D2898494961nhnak64519921:31680
Maybeso-Mosman complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes35B2145494951nhmak64519921:31680
Mosman-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes38D1689495011nhtak64519921:31680
Mosman-McGilvery complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes28B1637494791nh3ak64519921:31680
Mosman-Maybeso complex, 50 to 100 percent slopes35F342494971nhpak64519921:31680
McGilvery-Mosman-Rock outcrop complex, 76 to 140 percent slopes3067E27764498521nw4ak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman complex, broken, 56 to 75 percent slopes3651D14297500051p12ak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman complex, smooth, 56 to 75 percent slopes3551D12016499481nz7ak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman-McGilvery complex, deeply incised, 76 to 120 percent slopes3149E11529498651nwkak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman-McGilvery complex, smooth, 76 to 120 percent slopes3549E11234499461nz5ak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman-McGilvery complex, broken, 36 to 55 percent slope3649C8890500011p0yak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman-McGilvery complex, shallowly incised, 76 to 120 percent slopes3249E8422499021nxrak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman-McGilvery complex, rolling hills, 36 to 55 percent slopes4249C5898500541p2nak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman-McGilvery complex, broken, 76 to 12o percent slopes3649E4887500021p0zak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman complex, deeply incised, 56 to 75 percent slopes3151D4591498671nwmak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman complex, shallowly incised, 56 to 75 percent slopes3251D4461499041nxtak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman complex, smooth hills, 56 to 75 percent slopes4451D3329500821p3kak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman-McGilvery complex, smooth hills, 76 to 120 percent slopes4449E1953500801p3hak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman-McGilvery complex, dissected hills, 76 to 12o percent slopes4349E295500691p34ak64619921:31680
Tolstoi-Mosman complex, dissected hills, 56 to 75 percent slopes4351D217500701p35ak64619921:31680

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MOSMAN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .