Soil Data Explorer - MONAD

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MONAD soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MONAD, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MONAD were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
n/a	40A3618	S1964MT013002	Monad	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	40A3619	S1964MT013005	Monad	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MONAD soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MONAD series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the MONAD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the MONAD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MONAD share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the MONAD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the MONAD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MONAD, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing MONAD as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Monad fine sandy loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes	82	1424	498027	jq7d	co655	1984	1:24000
Monad fine sandy loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes	83	930	498028	jq7f	co655	1984	1:24000
Libeg-Monad complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes	50E	1460	1859531	20dzw	mt605	2007	1:24000
Libeg, stony-Monad complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes	3D	753	1859509	20dz5	mt605	2007	1:24000
Hairpin-Libeg, stony-Monad, stony complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes	6D	601	1859512	20dz8	mt605	2007	1:24000
Maurice, bouldery-Monad complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes	65E	245	1859536	20f01	mt605	2007	1:24000
Monad loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes	50C	54	1859550	20f0h	mt605	2007	1:24000
Hairpin-Libeg, stony-Monad, stony complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes	6D	10940	806443	w259	mt610	2005	1:24000
Libeg, stony-Monad complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes	3D	4546	804835	w0hf	mt610	2005	1:24000
Libeg-Monad complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes	50E	3374	1145112	17fl3	mt610	2005	1:24000
Maurice, bouldery-Monad complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes	65E	938	1469294	1l9xl	mt610	2005	1:24000
Libeg, stony-Monad complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes	3D	18	2512543	w0hf	mt612	2011	1:24000
Monad and Libeg soils, steep	150	47393	341813	cgp7	mt613	1975	1:24000
Monad loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes	148	6855	341810	cgp4	mt613	1975	1:24000
Monad loam, 10 to 20 percent slopes	149	5970	341811	cgp5	mt613	1975	1:24000
Monad loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes	50C	500	154890	565g	mt616	2003	1:24000
Libeg-Monad-Copenhaver complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes	854E	319	155111	56dl	mt616	2003	1:24000
Monad loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	50D	271	154891	565h	mt616	2003	1:24000
Libeg-Monad-Copenhaver complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes	854F	111	155112	56dm	mt616	2003	1:24000
Libeg-Monad-Copenhaver complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, moderately impacted	1854F	90	155267	56km	mt616	2003	1:24000
Libeg-Monad-Copenhaver complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, moderately impacted	1854E	71	155276	56kx	mt616	2003	1:24000
Libeg-Monad-Copenhaver complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes	854E	76	1703236	1v5c3	mt635	2006	1:24000
Libeg-Monad-Copenhaver complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes	854D	4027	145930	4wvf	mt644	1995	1:24000
Libeg-Monad-Copenhaver complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes	854E	2529	145931	4wvg	mt644	1995	1:24000
Monad loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes	50C	1185	145784	4wpq	mt644	1995	1:24000
Libeg-Monad-Copenhaver complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes	854F	455	145932	4wvh	mt644	1995	1:24000
Monad loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	50D	366	145785	4wpr	mt644	1995	1:24000
Monad loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes	50E	8	145786	4wps	mt644	1995	1:24000
Libeg-Monad-Copenhaver complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes	709E	68	362045	d4qw	mt670	2007	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MONAD soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).