Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MIRES soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MIRES, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MIRES were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MIRES soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MIRES series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MIRES series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MIRES series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MIRES share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MIRES series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MIRES series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MIRES, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing MIRES as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Mires gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesMg40281448814vrlmt61719581:20000
Mires loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesMn9151448854vrqmt61719581:20000
Mires gravelly loam, 12 to 30 percent slopesMm9111448844vrpmt61719581:20000
Mires gravelly loam, 3 to 7 percent slopesMh7861448824vrmmt61719581:20000
Flathead-Mires loams, 0 to 3 percent slopesFh6901448294vpxmt61719581:20000
Mires gravelly loam, 7 to 12 percent slopesMk4441448834vrnmt61719581:20000
Mires loam, 3 to 7 percent slopesMo3681448864vrrmt61719581:20000
Mires gravelly loam, 12 to 30 percent slopes, lake effect7E13117160481vlpdmt61719581:20000
Mires loam, 7 to 12 percent slopesMp1171448874vrsmt61719581:20000
Mires gravelly loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes, lake effect7C1917160461vlpbmt61719581:20000
Mires gravelly loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes, lake effect7D1017160471vlpcmt61719581:20000
Mires loamMo3113701202byywa61919681:24000
Mires gravelly loamMp2023701212byzwa61919681:24000
Mires sandy loam, alkaline subsoil variant, 25 to 45 percent slopesMrE1057701232bz1wa61919681:24000
Mires sandy loam, alkaline subsoil variant, 0 to 15 percent slopesMrC573701222bz0wa61919681:24000
Mires ashy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes3672485189980521rx1wa64920081:24000
Mires gravelly ashy loam, 3 to 25 percent slopes3681665189980721rx3wa64920081:24000
Mires ashy sandy loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes, stony3701500190008221s5zwa64920081:24000
Mires ashy sandy loam, 15 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony3711090189980421rx0wa64920081:24000
Mires gravelly ashy sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes369545189980321rwzwa64920081:24000
Mires-Leiko complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes372505190005421s52wa64920081:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MIRES soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .