Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MINWELLS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MINWELLS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MINWELLS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
80B40A4631S1974TX363001Minwells6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties32.7920306,-98.2002611

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MINWELLS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MINWELLS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MINWELLS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MINWELLS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MINWELLS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MINWELLS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MINWELLS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MINWELLS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TX-2010-11-03-23 | Hamilton County - 2007

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Minwells-Bastsil and Bosque-Frio-Venus general soil map units (Soil Survey of Hamilton County, Texas; 2007).

  2. TX-2010-11-04-05 | McLennan County - 2001

    Pattern of soils in the Weswood-Yahola-Ships general soil map unit (Soil Survey of McLennan County, Texas; 2001).

  3. TX-2010-11-04-10 | Milam County - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Wilson-Davilla general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Milam County, Texas; 2004).

  4. TX-2012-03-20-29 | Coryell County - May 1985

    Typical pattern of soils in the Bosque-Frio-Lewisville map unit and the Bastsil-Minwells map unit (Soil Survey of Coryell County, TX; 1985).

  5. TX-2012-03-21-57 | Palo Pinto County - August 1981

    Typical pattern of soils in the Minwells-Thurber map unit (Soil Survey of Palo Pinto County, TX; 1981).

  6. TX-2012-03-21-83 | Stephens County - May 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Bastrop-Minwells general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Stephens County, TX; 1994).

Map Units

Map units containing MINWELLS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Minwells fine sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopesMwC169831300552s1rvtx02719721:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, warm, 1 to 3 percent slopesMwB10623911162vgfhtx02719721:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, warm, 1 to 3 percent slopesMnB41553630032vgfhtx03519771:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedMnC222973630062tc2btx03519771:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMnC12153630042tc2ctx03519771:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, warm, 1 to 3 percent slopesMnB89103911622vgfhtx09919831:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, warm, 1 to 3 percent slopesMnB27603766672vgfhtx19319941:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMwB12383680482tc29tx23719921:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, warm, 1 to 3 percent slopesMnB9003681892vgfhtx25119811:20000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedMnC24833681902tc2btx25119811:20000
Minwells fine sandy loam, warm, 1 to 3 percent slopesMnB9053688662vgfhtx28119901:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, warm, 1 to 3 percent slopesMnB45843701132vgfhtx30919921:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedMnC226553701142tc2btx30919921:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopesMwC2131031300852s1rvtx33119881:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMwB155703909552tc29tx36319791:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedMwC233003909572tc2btx36319791:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMwC14113909562tc2ctx36319791:24000
Minwells loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMnB2605372068dh56tx41719851:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMfB60353721982tc29tx42919851:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMwB41193737702tc29tx50320031:24000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedMwC222132212802tc2btx60919751:20000
Minwells fine sandy loam, warm, 1 to 3 percent slopesMwB6032212782vgfhtx60919751:20000
Minwells fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMwC5932212792tc2ctx60919751:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MINWELLS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .