Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MINTO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MINTO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MINTO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MINTO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance bar figure.



There are insufficient data to create the water balance line figure.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MINTO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MINTO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MINTO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MINTO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MINTO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MINTO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MINTO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. AK-2011-05-27-01 | Fairbanks Area - 1959

    Diagram of a landscape showing relationship of soil series, underlying material, and permafrost. Adapted from Pewe (Soil Survey of Fairbanks Area, Alaska; 1959).

Map Units

Map units containing MINTO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Minto silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes1437768692873r7zrak61020031:25000
Minto silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes1446258692874r7zsak61020031:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes1454849692913r811ak61020031:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 3 to 7 percent slopes1464704692914r812ak61020031:25000
Saulich-Minto complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes1683767692925r81fak61020031:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 7 to 12 percent slopes1471605692915r813ak61020031:25000
Saulich-Minto complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes169268692926r81gak61020031:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes148220692916r814ak61020031:25000
Minto silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes142110692872r7zqak61020031:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 3 to 7 percent slopes411B5336510961q58ak65020061:24000
Minto silt loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes41D4002511111q5rak65020061:24000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 7 to 12 percent slopes411C3863510971q59ak65020061:24000
Minto silt loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes41C3710510591q42ak65020061:24000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes411D3252519901r33ak65020061:24000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes411A1811511181q5zak65020061:24000
Minto silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes41B1370510581q41ak65020061:24000
Eutrocryept and Minto silt loams, 3 to 20 percent slopes85450520041r3kak65020061:24000
Minto silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes41A252511101q5qak65020061:24000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 3 to 7 percent slopes31MN0619066202559325zsqak65520071:25000
Minto silt loam, 7 to 12 percent31MN0316642202559025zsmak65520071:25000
Minto silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes31MN029815202558925zslak65520071:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 7 to 12 percent slopes31MN074169202559425zsrak65520071:25000
Saulich-Minto complex, 3 to 7 percent slopes31SA052218202560225zt0ak65520071:25000
Minto silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes31MN01277202558825zskak65520071:25000
Minto-Chatanika complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes31MN08234202559525zssak65520071:25000
Saulich-Minto complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes31SA07170202560425zt2ak65520071:25000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MINTO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .