Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MINOA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MINOA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MINOA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
n/a40A037956PA049011Minoa4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.0533409,-80.2797699

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MINOA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MINOA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MINOA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MINOA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MINOA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MINOA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MINOA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MINOA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NY-2012-02-15-07 | Chautauqua County - August 1994

    Soils and parent material on a bedrock escarpment and on a lake plain that includes the Beach Ridge (Soil Survey of Chautauqua County, New York; August 1994).

  2. NY-2012-02-15-37 | Niagara County - October 1972

    Typical cross section of the Otisville-Altmar-Fredon-Stafford association (Soil Survey of Niagara County, New York; October 1972).

Map Units

Map units containing MINOA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Minoa loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopesMuA246418688268ggmi04919671:20000
Minoa loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes29A1672186619685zmi07319831:15840
Minoa-Thetford complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesMwB41281875906969mi09319681:20000
Minoa fine sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopesMsB2747187670698wmi09919671:20000
Minoa-Lamson complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesMsA3625187439691fmi14719691:20000
Minoa fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesMoA3159187436691bmi14719691:20000
Minoa fine sandy loam, clay substratum, 0 to 3 percent slopesMrA1634187438691dmi14719691:20000
Minoa fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesMoB457187437691cmi14719691:20000
Minoa fine sandy loam, clay substratum, 0 to 3 percent slopesMrA32508297691dmi15119551:15840
Minoa loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopesMyA3723948002lczmmi15519671:12000
Minoa silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesMknB678298511b0mdnj02719741:24000
Minoa silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesMknA236298510b0mcnj02719741:24000
Minoa very fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes47A13052896099qc7ny00920021:24000
Minoa fine sandy loamMf9642894519q64ny01119681:15840
Minoa fine sandy loamMn55862898559qm5ny01319881:15840
Minoa very fine sandy loamMh63302908629rnnny02919791:15840
Minoa very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesMnA1568633026p7q6ny03720041:24000
Minoa fine sandy loamMv42132918819sqjny04519811:15840
Minoa fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesJaA4112677717bmlhny04920181:24000
Minoa very fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes18A9731057822ywl1ny05120191:24000
Minoa very fine sandy loamMt25792926039tgtny05319751:15840
Minoa very fine sandy loamMn56012927339tm0ny05519671:15840
Minoa fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes750B56242934839vd6ny06519931:24000
Minoa fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesMtA39462936219vjnny06719731:20000
Minoa fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesMtB5882936229vjpny06719731:20000
Minoa very fine sandy loamMo22772940579vzqny07319731:15840
Minoa very fine sandy loamMn71972941359w27ny07519731:15840
Minoa fine sandy loam, moderately well drained variant, 0 to 6 percent slopesMoB14812941369w28ny07519731:15840
Minoa very fine sandy loamMn102852957599xrmny11719721:15840
Minoa very fine sandy loamMh3772893009q18ny60519811:24000
Minoa very fine sandy loamMn59312930239txcny66419681:15840
Minoa fine sandy loamMo9362868269mggoh08519761:15840
Minoa fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesMnA276326330692rg7fpa04920121:12000
Minoa fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesMnB55326330702rg7gpa04920121:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MINOA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .