Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MINED LAND soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MINED LAND, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MINED LAND were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14766PA1070091966PA107009Mined land4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.7516667,-76.1455556

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MINED LAND soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance bar figure.



There are insufficient data to create the water balance line figure.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MINED LAND series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MINED LAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MINED LAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MINED LAND share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MINED LAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MINED LAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MINED LAND, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

This figure is not available.

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing MINED LAND as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Mined, Pits and Dump land68010731096372ybs4az6571:24000
Mined land6412300115180217njxaz66120091:24000
Mined land6051016785251tbmzaz66620071:24000
Mined land5001442424504592n7x2az6871:24000
Atravesada-Mined land, asbestos complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes767fw2812562649hp27ca06919651:20000
Mined land, mercury, 2 to 30 percent slopes21321825150452q3dyca06919651:20000
Mined land, mercury, 30 to 75 percent slopes21420525150462q3dzca06919651:20000
Mined land, asbestos, 2 to 30 percent slopes769fw982562650hp28ca06919651:20000
Atravesada-Mined land, asbestos complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes765fw702562648hp26ca06919651:20000
Mined land, chromium, 2 to 30 percent slopes2153825150472q3f0ca06919651:20000
Mined land, chromium, 30 to 75 percent slopes2161925150482q3f1ca06919651:20000
Mined land, benitoite, 2 to 30 percent slopes2171125150322q3f2ca06919651:20000
Mined land, magnesite, 30 to 75 percent slopes218925150312q3f3ca06919651:20000
Mined Land-Anthraltic Xerorthents complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes10136129249482x4d4ca07719901:24000
Mined Land1012248124037092lp80ca63020181:24000
Mined Land-Anthraltic Xerorthents complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes1013113029249142x4d4ca63020181:24000
Mined Land-Anthraltic Xerorthents complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes101325429249572x4d4ca63220061:24000
Atravesada-Mined land, asbestos complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes7675814467115hp27ca65320001:24000
Atravesada-Mined land, asbestos complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes765776467114hp26ca65320001:24000
Mined land, asbestos, 2 to 30 percent slopes769356467116hp28ca65320001:24000
Mined land, chromium, 30 to 75 percent slopes216sb6425626622q3f1ca65320001:24000
Mined land, mercury, 30 to 75 percent slopes214sb1625626602q3dzca65320001:24000
Mined land, chromium, 2 to 30 percent slopes215sb1525626612q3f0ca65320001:24000
Mined land, magnesite, 30 to 75 percent slopes218sb1225626592q3f3ca65320001:24000
Mined land, oil wells9997129829114402w60jca69620161:24000
Mined Land10121029250132lp80ca73119811:24000
Mined land203115332102332zf0pco64419801:24000
Mined landML9094507011k0l6co6481:24000
Mined land4ML361214151251jhk6co6541:24000
Mine pits and DumpsMP1760498070jq8sco65819681:20000
Mined land4ML131769441jhk6co66119681:31680
Mined land, open pit43B90233800355bmjid7011:24000
Mined land, reclaimed and/or overburden129027331734322yy5bid7031:24000
Mined land, reclaimed and/or overburden293C440529808912dvg5id7131:24000
Mined land, open pit293A283129808895bmjid7131:24000
Mined land, slag and/or tailings293B575298089028sjjid7131:24000
Mined land, reclaimed with impermeable cap293D28629808922x01pid7131:24000
Mined land, reclaimed and/or overburden293C359922299592dvg5id7161:24000
Mined land, open pit293A14691591705bmjid7161:24000
Mined land, slag and/or tailings293B645210894628sjjid7161:24000
Typic Cryorthents, Furniss, rarely flooded, and Mined land soils, 0 to 12 percent slopes609917831756332z43sid7161:24000
Mined land2004892820836cnqtmt6321:24000
Mined land200F1318347628cnqtmt64119941:24000
Mined landML2833558711w49nm61419661:20000
Mined land9991102624259382mfd2or6451:24000
Strip minesSr4467539409l399pa02519601:20000
Strip mines, acidSm123538347l261pa02719751:20000
Strip Mine, Active, 8 to 40 percent slopes93D494514828121lrznpa03319811:20000
Strip Mine, Active, 0 to 8 percent slopes93B22914828111lrzmpa03319811:20000
Mined land, reclaimedMu364527350kpr9tn05519651:15840
MINE LANDML25514671i60hwy6031:24000
Anthroportic Ustorthents-Aridic Lithic Ustorthents-Mined land complex, 0 to 60 percent slopes70730038392x7bfwy6301:24000
Mined land--draftMine31697142y0yxwy7231:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MINED LAND soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .