Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MIKIM soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MIKIM, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MIKIM were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
3683P080383CO083001Mikim8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.245,-108.653

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MIKIM soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MIKIM series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MIKIM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MIKIM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MIKIM share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MIKIM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MIKIM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MIKIM, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing MIKIM as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Mikim loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes4410451583051yntco66919821:24000
Mikim loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes641678594482tkxlco67020051:24000
Mikim clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes63288594472tkxhco67020051:24000
Mikim clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes735404577002tkxhco67119971:24000
Mikim loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes753973577022tkxlco67119971:24000
Mikim clay loam, sodic, 0 to 3 percent slopes74565577011y1bco67119971:24000
Mikim loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes566115502080jvg4co67519861:24000
Mikim loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes118403928989105pdco68519791:24000
Mikim silt loam, sodic, 1 to 4 percent slopes11973928990105pfco68519791:24000
Mikim loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes264536629945p4htco68619921:31680
Mikim complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes237147629841p4dgco68619921:31680
Mikim silt loam, sodic, 1 to 4 percent slopes26526629961p4jbco68619921:31680
Mikim complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes36330506256jzsvco69219981:24000
Mikim loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes25924243568671x5fnm68219851:24000
Mikim loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMaB456317037621v5x2ut0131:24000
Mikim loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes13712280505403jyxbut04719991:24000
Walknolls-Mikim association, 2 to 50 percent slopes26310935505543jz1vut04719991:24000
Bullpen-Mikim complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes314748505571jz2rut04719991:24000
Mikim silt loam, sodic, 1 to 4 percent slopes1394681505405jyxdut04719991:24000
Mikim complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes1353275505401jyx8ut04719991:24000
Mikim loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes1361919505402jyx9ut04719991:24000
Mikim silt loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes138497505404jyxcut04719991:24000
Mikim-Hickerson association, 1 to 4 percent slopes140210505407jyxgut04719991:24000
Mikim sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes884030504486jxyrut63619841:24000
Mikim clay loam, dry, 1 to 2 percent slopes913263504490jxywut63619841:24000
Mikim clay loam, dry, 2 to 5 percent slopes922645504491jxyxut63619841:24000
Mikim loam, dry, 1 to 2 percent slopes891660504487jxysut63619841:24000
Mikim loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes90593504489jxyvut63619841:24000
Mikim family, 2 to 5 percent slopes477783512515k69rut6461:24000
Mikim-Mivida, moist, complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes4113225074542q70qut68519901:24000
Skyvillage-Mikim-Badland, Kaiparowits Formation, complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes51274222059793206tut68620041:24000
Elias-Mikim complex, 1 to 7 percent slopes5143113759723204kut68620041:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MIKIM soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .