Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MIDDLEBURY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MIDDLEBURY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MIDDLEBURY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14099P0377S99NY003002Middlebury6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.0266685,-77.9075012
14211N6710S2010VT007005Middlebury6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.5097351,-73.0581589

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MIDDLEBURY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MIDDLEBURY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MIDDLEBURY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MIDDLEBURY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MIDDLEBURY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MIDDLEBURY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MIDDLEBURY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MIDDLEBURY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NY-2010-09-28-01 | Cattarugus County - 2007

    Representative landscape showing soils that formed in residual material, glacial till, glacial outwash, or alluvium (Soil Survey of Cattarugus County, New York; 2007).

  2. NY-2012-02-15-10 | Chautauqua County - August 1994

    Representative landscape showing soils that formed in residual material, glacial till, glacial outwash, or alluvium (Soil Survey of Chautauqua County, New York; August 1994).

  3. NY-2012-02-15-44 | Seneca Nation of Indians - August 1984

    Typical relationship of soils to parent material in the Allegheny River Valley (Soil Survey of Seneca Nation of Indians, New York; August 1984).

  4. NY-2012-02-15-49 | Warren County - January 1989

    Typical relationship of upland and valley soils to landscape position and underlying deposits near the Schroon River (Soil Survey of Warren County, New York; January 1989).

  5. PA-2012-03-13-17 | Cumberland and Perry Counties - April 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Berks-Weikert-Bedington association (Soil Survey of Cumberland and Perry Counties, PA; 1986).

  6. PA-2012-03-13-19 | Cumberland and Perry Counties - April 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Hazleton-Laidig-Buchanan association (Soil Survey of Cumberland and Perry Counties, PA; 1986).

Map Units

Map units containing MIDDLEBURY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Middlebury silt loamMk3182887599pgtny00119851:15840
Middlebury silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes8A4722185997120fg2ny00320131:24000
Middlebury silt loamMs43872892009py1ny00719661:15840
Middlebury silt loam833062897139qglny00920021:24000
Middlebury silt loamMe18242898549qm4ny01319881:15840
Middlebury silt loamMe31262899409qpxny01519691:20000
Middlebury silt loamMg44072908619rnmny02919791:15840
Middlebury silt loamMn393301747b3zsny03720041:24000
Middlebury silt loamMk3332916799sj0ny03919851:24000
Middlebury silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded8A99231056392y9v1ny05120191:24000
Middlebury silt loamMr8772926029tgsny05319751:15840
Middlebury silt loamMy30052939399vvxny07119761:15840
Middlebury loamMf9662941339w25ny07519731:15840
Basher and Middlebury silt loamsBm36142944549wdjny09519651:15840
Middlebury silt loamMp64412948399wsyny10119721:15840
Middlebury silt loamMl53002958389xv5ny10719471:31680
Middlebury silt loam, high bottomMlb4662958399xv6ny10719471:31680
Middlebury and Tioga silt loamsMo10152956639xnjny10919631:20000
Middlebury silt loamMr14462955059xhfny11119741:15840
Middlebury fine sandy loamMu10462959059xxbny11319821:15840
Middlebury silt loamMg29772892999q17ny60519811:24000
Middlebury silt loamMe3899543048l72ppa01119971:24000
Tioga and Middlebury very stony loams, 0 to 8 percent slopesTmB1860539416l39jpa02519601:20000
Middlebury silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesMdA1563539377l388pa02519601:20000
Middlebury silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesMdB1148539378l389pa02519601:20000
Middlebury and Tioga silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes, severely erodedMeA3279539379l38bpa02519601:20000
Middlebury silt loamMd3172539536l3fdpa03719651:20000
Middlebury fine sandy loamMb817539535l3fcpa03719651:20000
Middlebury soilsMf1372693774r8xtpa04119801:15840
Middlebury silt loam1Me184557333lpyhpa07119821:15840
Middlebury silt loam1Me20541355l5b2pa07519761:20000
Middlebury silt loamMe2351543171l76npa07719971:24000
Middlebury silt loamMb907194878223dvypa09520071:12000
Middlebury soilsMf3468693999r952pa09919801:15840
Middlebury, acid subsoil and Basher soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedMpA146424330892z5wmpa10519531:24000
Middlebury, acid subsoil, and Basher soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedMnA44331557902z5wlpa10519531:24000
Middlebury loam10620242821109gkbvt02119851:20000
Middlebury loam, frequently floodedMr441553366lktjwv04320051:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MIDDLEBURY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .