Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the METONGA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of METONGA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to METONGA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the METONGA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the METONGA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the METONGA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the METONGA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with METONGA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the METONGA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the METONGA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with METONGA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing METONGA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Gogebic-Metonga-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes, very stony809D1124614444911kh3hwi00320061:12000
Gogebic-Metonga-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 18 percent slopes, very stony809C755914444901kh3gwi00320061:12000
Gogebic-Metonga-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes, very stony809D853113839081hg26wi00720051:12000
Rock outcrop-Frogcreek-Metonga complex, 2 to 45 percent slopes, very stony524E821782477v876wi00720051:12000
Metonga-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 45 percent slopes309E783782466v86vwi00720051:12000
Metonga-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes309C671782465v86twi00720051:12000
Gogebic-Metonga-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 18 percent slopes, very stony809C54413839071hg25wi00720051:12000
Springstead-Parkfalls-Metonga complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stony728C3794781456v758wi03120051:12000
Metonga-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 20 percent slopes309C1094781176v6w7wi03120051:12000
Rock outcrop-Frogcreek-Metonga complex, 2 to 45 percent slopes, very stony524E726781316v70rwi03120051:12000
Metonga-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 45 percent slopes309E203781177v6w8wi03120051:12000
Rock outcrop-Metonga-Sarona complex, 1 to 15 percent slopesRmC4832430036gfh4wi03719951:12000
Rock outcrop-Metonga-Sarona complex, 15 to 35 percent slopesRmD3906430037gfh5wi03719951:12000
Metonga-Rock outcrop complex, 4 to 60 percent slopes, very stonyMeD718429846gf90wi04119951:12000
Rock outcrop-Frogcreek-Metonga complex, 2 to 45 percent slopes, very stony524E681449014h27bwi12920021:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the METONGA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .