Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MESA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MESA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MESA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
34B81P062281CO085001Mesa7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.4952774,-107.9938889
34B99P020899CO085001MESA7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.5155563,-107.9444427
34B99P021199CO085004MESA7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.6552773,-108.1102753

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MESA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MESA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MESA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MESA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MESA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MESA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MESA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MESA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing MESA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Mesa family, 1 to 4 percent slopes609639580222qsyjaz71520071:24000
Mesa clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes76028768508783k2fcco67720181:24000
Mesa gravelly loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes7259141512818k6mjco67720181:24000
Mesa gravelly loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes7648186656115q0r0co67720181:24000
Mesa gravelly clay loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes7651094779397v50vco67720181:24000
Mesa-Grunnell, stony complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes787836806458w25sco67720181:24000
Mesa-Waterdog complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes807164692453r7k6co67720181:24000
Mesa-Utaline stony loams, 3 to 12 percent slopes555255496634jnsgco67919761:24000
Mesa loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes544981496633jnsfco67919761:24000
Mesa loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes532704496632jnsdco67919761:24000
Mesa clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes7609242990925k2fcco67919761:24000
Mesa gravelly loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes7641972990956q0r0co67919761:24000
Mesa gravelly clay loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes765352990926v50vco67919761:24000
Mesa-Avalon complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes516443496714jnw1co68219861:24000
Mack-Mesa fine sandy loams, 1 to 4 percent slopes2108412573731xprnm71719931:24000
Mesa fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes1555067573561xp6nm71719931:24000
Mesa sandy clay loam, wet, 0 to 1 percent slopes2951674573901xq9nm71719931:24000
Mesa clay loam, wet, 0 to 1 percent slopes290990573891xq8nm71719931:24000
Mesa-Tusher complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes093188715312081ndbtut62320111:24000
Mesa-Chipeta-Thedalund family complex3129052504525jy00ut62419851:24000
Mesa-Trook complex3216148504526jy01ut62419851:24000
Mesa fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes3010234504524jxzzut62419851:24000
Mesa-Leebench-Nakoy families association, 0 to 10 percent slopes41061532631938452z92gut6251:24000
Mesa-Aysees-like-Sierravista-like complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes211729690512wxl6wy6291:24000
Mesa-Aysees-like-Sierravista-like complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes221629690562wxlcwy6291:24000
Mesa-Sierravista-like, extremely bouldery complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes212229690552wxlbwy6291:24000
Griffy-Mesa complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes212129690542wxl9wy6291:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MESA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .