Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MELBOURNE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MELBOURNE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MELBOURNE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
172C0067S1972WA041004MELBOURNE7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.5525742,-123.2123413
172C0068S1972WA041005MELBOURNE7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.755352,-123.0503998
172C0069S1972WA041011MELBOURNE6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.3925781,-123.0145569
211N1295S10OR071030Melbourne7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.4173583,-123.1878111
205N0277S2004OR071010MELBOURNE7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.375946,-123.3208084
206N0915S2006OR071003Melbourne7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.1422768,-123.4275818

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MELBOURNE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MELBOURNE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MELBOURNE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MELBOURNE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MELBOURNE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MELBOURNE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MELBOURNE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MELBOURNE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WA-2012-05-11-33 | Lewis County Area - May 1987

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Melbourne-Buckpeak-Centralia map unit (Soil Survey of Lewis County Area, Washington; May 1987).

Map Units

Map units containing MELBOURNE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Melbourne-Holland families association, deep, 35 to 70 percent slopes25225716470245hsb6ca70119841:24000
Clallam family, moderately deep, unstable-Melbourne family, deep association, 35 to 70 percent slopes23717270470233hs9tca70119841:24000
Melbourne-Soulajule families association, deep, 5 to 35 percent slopes2385928470234hs9vca70119841:24000
Clallam family, moderately deep, unstable-Melbourne family, deep association, 35 to 70 percent slopes.237sr398186818020pzwca70719831:24000
Melbourne-Holland families association, deep, 35 to 70 percent slopes.252sr171186818620q02ca70719831:24000
Clallam family, moderately deep, unstable-Melbourne family, deep association, 35 to 70 percent slopes237sr18027478832q3rsca70920101:24000
Melbourne silty clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes31D52186147221yzor06719751:20000
Melbourne silty clay loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes31F38386147421z1or06719751:20000
Melbourne silty clay loam, 7 to 12 percent slopes31C33776147121yyor06719751:20000
Melbourne silty clay loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes31E29746147321z0or06719751:20000
Melbourne silty clay loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes31B7756147021yxor06719751:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 12 to 20 percent slopes2790D7427111221jrw8or06719751:20000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes2789C3427111211jrw1or06719751:20000
Melbourne-Witham complex, hummocky, 2 to 25 percent slopes,2769C3427111111j8cgor06719751:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 30 to 60 percent slopes2790F2627111241jrwbor06719751:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 20 to 30 percent slopes2790E2527111231jrw9or06719751:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 12 to 20 percent slopes2770D1827111131j8cjor06719751:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 20 to 30 percent slopes2770E1727111141j8ckor06719751:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 30 to 60 percent slopes2770F827111151j8clor06719751:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 2 to 12 percent slopes2770C727111121j8chor06719751:20000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 12 to 20 percent slopes2790D595527314381jrw8or07119671:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 20 to 30 percent slopes2790E505927112831jrw9or07119671:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 30 to 60 percent slopes2770F378727112751j8clor07119671:24000
Melbourne-Witham complex, hummocky, 2 to 25 percent slopes,2769C313327114101j8cgor07119671:24000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes2789C288627113341jrw1or07119671:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 20 to 30 percent slopes2770E248527314511j8ckor07119671:24000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes2767D190127113821j8ccor07119671:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silty clay loams, 30 to 60 percent slopes2790F174227113681jrwbor07119671:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 12 to 20 percent slopes2770D171127113481j8cjor07119671:24000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 20 to 30 percent slopes2767E118727112941j8cdor07119671:24000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes2771E59627113841j8cmor07119671:24000
Melbourne-Goodin silt loams, 2 to 12 percent slopes2770C51727112821j8chor07119671:24000
Melbourne-Witham complex, hummocky, 5 to 25 percent, moist2805E43627112962n8r1or07119671:24000
Goodin-Melbourne complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes2767F22627113581j8cfor07119671:24000
Melbourne-Witham complex, very hummocky, 2 to 40 percent slopes2822E7627113602q3klor07119671:24000
Melbourne loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes1291830721622f2twa01519941:24000
Melbourne loam, 8 to 20 percent slopes1281105721612f2swa01519941:24000
Melbourne loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes26614736629sqj7wa01519941:24000
Melbourne silt loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes776673736752gnmwa62719791:24000
Melbourne silt loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes76286736742gnlwa62719791:24000
Melbourne silt loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes78210736762gnnwa62719791:24000
Melbourne loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes13238579742792h93wa64119801:24000
Melbourne loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes13127125742782h92wa64119801:24000
Melbourne loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes1309710742772h91wa64119801:24000
Melbourne silty clay loam, 20 to 40 percent slopes67879324546892nd9jwa66719831:24000
Melbourne silty clay loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes66491824546882nd9hwa66719831:24000
Melbourne silty clay loam, 40 to 65 percent slopes68466724546902nd9kwa66719831:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MELBOURNE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .