Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MCCONNEL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MCCONNEL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MCCONNEL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
2486P076286NV013300McConnel7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.6282272,-117.8070831

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MCCONNEL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MCCONNEL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MCCONNEL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MCCONNEL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MCCONNEL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MCCONNEL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MCCONNEL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MCCONNEL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OR-2010-09-29-05 | Harney County Area - 2006

    Soil and landscape relationship in Pueblo Valley (Soil Survey of Harney County Area, Oregon; 2006).

  2. OR-2010-09-29-09 | Lake County, Southern Part - 1999

    Soil-landscape relationships in Warren Valley. Icene and Mesman soils on basin floor, McConnel soils on terraces, Pait soils on fans, Riddleranch soils on escarpments, and Hager soils on tablelands (Soil Survey of Lake County, Oregon, Southern Part; 1999).

  3. OR-2012-05-10-18 | Lake County, Southern Part - 1999

    Soil-landscape relationships in Warner Valley. Icene and Mesman soils on basin floor, McConnel soils on terraces, Pait soils on fans, Riddleranch soils on escarpments, and Hager soils on tablelands (Soil Survey of Lake County Oregon, Southern Part; 1999).

  4. OR-2012-05-10-28 | Harney County Area - 2006

    Soil and landscape relationship in Pueblo Valley (Soil Survey of Harney County Area, Oregon; 2006).

Map Units

Map units containing MCCONNEL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Cewat-McConnel-Toulon association, 2 to 15 percent slopes1497053487402jc5nca60820001:24000
McConnel-Mottsville complex, 2 to 9 percent slopes2832481487594jccvca60820001:24000
McConnel gravelly fine sandy loamMf4529476112hzfgnv61219681:24000
McConnel-Blackhawk complexMh2915476113hzfhnv61219681:24000
McConnel-Ocala complexMo424476114hzfjnv61219681:24000
McConnel very stony sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes1120100474486hxr0nv75919951:24000
McConnel very stony sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes58016381474766hy11nv76019941:24000
McConnel very gravelly fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 1/5812521474767hy12nv76019941:24000
McConnel-Rasille-Wholan association63342315479287j2qwnv76819851:63360
McConnel-Orovada-Misad association6327285479286j2qvnv76819851:63360
McConnel-Wholan association6384220479291j2r0nv76819851:63360
McConnel-Rasille association6353620479288j2qxnv76819851:63360
Orovada-McConnel association7042965479301j2rbnv76819851:63360
Tulase-Bubus-McConnel association109229004790342v43mnv76819851:63360
McConnel-Defler-Rasille association6362325479289j2qynv76819851:63360
McConnel-Orovada association6372045479290j2qznv76819851:63360
McConnel loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes3302143475265hyk4nv76919861:24000
McConnel gravelly fine sandy loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes3311428475266hyk5nv76919861:24000
Beoska-Oxcorel-McConnel association1775405479504j2ywnv77519851:24000
McConnel-Tulase association6314220479696j352nv77519851:24000
Tulase-Bubus-McConnel association109217854794092v43mnv77519851:24000
Tulase-Bubus-McConnel association1203127574797692v43mnv77619831:63360
Enko-Davey-McConnel association8227233479894j3cgnv77619831:63360
Chiara-Dacker-McConnel association18522292475615hyxfnv77719931:24000
Hunnton-Flue-McConnel association117217110475429hyqfnv77719931:24000
Snapp-McConnel-Adelaide association75616844475914hz72nv77719931:24000
McConnel-Pumper-Whirlo complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes33815675475691hyzwnv77719931:24000
Connel-McConnel complex, rarely flooded, 0 to 2 percent slopes 1 /25513912475652hyymnv77719931:24000
McConnel gravelly fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes33113722475685hyzpnv77719931:24000
Connel-McConnel complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 1/2538887475650hyyknv77719931:24000
McConnel very gravelly fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 1/3355471475689hyztnv77719931:24000
Zevadez-McConnel association9635170476003hz9ynv77719931:24000
McConnel fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 1/3304960475684hyznnv77719931:24000
McConnel-Shabliss association3332846475687hyzrnv77719931:24000
Chiara-McConnel association1842349475614hyxdnv77719931:24000
Pyrat-McConnel association14949136480280j3rxnv78019901:24000
Yody-Blimo-McConnel association5704763480530j40znv78019901:24000
McConnel cobbly sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes19225435490570jggvor62819971:24000
Calderwood-McConnel complex, 0 to 20 percent slopes536000490887jgt2or62819971:24000
Calderwood-McConnel complex, 0 to 20 percent slopes2382020016897481tqb0or63520061:24000
Enko-McConnel complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes2941369616898031tqcsor63520061:24000
McConnel-Poorjug complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes439791716899431tqj9or63520061:24000
McConnel gravelly sandy loam, sodic substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopes435433616899391tqj5or63520061:24000
McConnel very gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes436355016899401tqj6or63520061:24000
Mesman-McConnel-Kewake complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes447226016899511tqjkor63520061:24000
Locolake-McConnel complex, 3 to 10 percent slopes419214916899241tqhpor63520061:24000
McConnel very gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes437187516899411tqj7or63520061:24000
McConnel-Turpin complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes440135116899441tqjbor63520061:24000
McConnel-Davey complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes438106016899421tqj8or63520061:24000
McConnel cobbly sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes43448616899381tqj4or63520061:24000
McConnel very gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes153C11210488968jdt5or63619911:24000
McConnel very gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes153A6140488967jdt4or63619911:24000
McConnel gravelly sandy loam, sodic substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopes156B1312488972jdt9or63619911:24000
McConnel-Icene complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes157C1121488973jdtbor63619911:24000
McConnel very gravelly sandy loam, cold, 2 to 15 percent slopes155C614488971jdt8or63619911:24000
McConnel extremely stony loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes154C519488969jdt6or63619911:24000
McConnel association, 30 to 50 percent slopes158F448488974jdtcor63619911:24000
McConnel cobbly sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes450B9317209821vrtkor63619911:24000
McConnel cobbly sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesOR019290624940862pr0nor64420211:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MCCONNEL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .