Aggregate lab data for the MCAFEE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MCAFEE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MCAFEE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE
Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MCAFEE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.
Click the image to view it full size.
Click the image to view it full size.
Sibling Summary
Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MCAFEE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).
Click the image to view it full size.
Select annual climate data summaries for the MCAFEE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).
Click the image to view it full size.
Geomorphic description summaries for the MCAFEE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom).
Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats.
Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).
Click the image to view it full size.
Click the image to view it full size.
Click the image to view it full size.
Click the image to view it full size.
Click the image to view it full size.
Competing Series
Soil series competing with MCAFEE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).
Click the image to view it full size.
Select annual climate data summaries for the MCAFEE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).
Click the image to view it full size.
Geomorphic description summaries for the MCAFEE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership.
Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats.
The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).
Click the image to view it full size.
Click the image to view it full size.
There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.
There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.
There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.
Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MCAFEE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).
Block Diagrams
Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Fairmount-Rock outcrop-McAfee unit (Soil Survey of Anderson and Franklin Counties, Kentucky; May 1985).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Elk-McAfee-Otwell unit (Soil Survey of Anderson and Franklin Counties, Kentucky; May 1985).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Ashton-Huntington-Elk unit (Soil Survey of Anderson and Franklin Counties, Kentucky; May 1985).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the McAfee-Faywood-Fairmount unit (Soil Survey of Anderson and Franklin Counties, Kentucky; May 1985).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Maury-McAfee unit (Soil Survey of Anderson and Franklin Counties, Kentucky; May 1985).
Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Maury-McAfee-Lowell map unit (Soil Survey of Bourbon and Nicholas Counties, Kentucky; October 1982).
Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the McAfee-Caleast-Fairmount map unit (Soil Survey of Boyle and Mercer Counties, Kentucky; April 1983).
Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Trappist-McAfee-Colyer map unit (Soil Survey of Boyle and Mercer Counties, Kentucky; April 1983).
Major soil series in soil association 1, their relationship to the landscape, and the parent rocks from which the soils formed (Soil Survey of Clark County, Kentucky; 1964).
Major soil series in soil association 2, their relationship to the landscape, and the parent rocks from which the soils formed (Soil Survey of Clark County, Kentucky; 1964).
Geolgic cross section of Clark County, showing some of the principal soils and their relation to the rock formations (Soil Survey of Clark County, Kentucky; 1964).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in association 1. Unshaded areas represent caverns or sinkholes in the limestone bedrock (Soil Survey of Fayette County, Kentucky; February 1968).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in association 3. Unshaded areas represent caverns or sinkholes in the limestone bedrock (Soil Survey of Fayette County, Kentucky; February 1968).
Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in association 4. Unshaded areas represent caverns or sinkholes in the limestone bedrock (Soil Survey of Fayette County, Kentucky; February 1968).
Major and minor soils in association 1, their relationship to the landscape, and the parent material from which the soils formed (Soil Survey of Harrison County, Kentucky; April 1968).
KY-2012-01-31-21 | Jessamine and Woodford Counties - December 1983
Pattern of soils and underlying material in Maury-McAfee unit (Soil Survey of Jessamine and Woodford Counties, Kentucky; December 1983).
KY-2012-01-31-22 | Jessamine and Woodford Counties - December 1983
Pattern of soils and underlying material in McAfee-Maury-Fairmount unit (Soil Survey of Jessamine and Woodford Counties, Kentucky; December 1983).
KY-2012-01-31-23 | Jessamine and Woodford Counties - December 1983
Pattern of soils and underlying material in Fairmount-Rock outcrop unit (Soil Survey of Jessamine and Woodford Counties, Kentucky; December 1983).
Map Units
Map units containing MCAFEE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.
Approximate geographic distribution of the MCAFEE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application.
Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).
