Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MARROWBONE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MARROWBONE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MARROWBONE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
12565KY-125-02765KY-125-027Marrowbone3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.1363,-84.2218694
12583KY-195-01683KY-195-016Marrowbonen/aPrimary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.4947853,-82.2323456
12583KY-195-01783KY-195-017Marrowbonen/aPrimary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.4750671,-82.4059601
12583P064983KY195 Marrowbone-OSDMarrowbone7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.4769444,-82.385
n/a65KY-199-06665KY-199-066Marrowbone3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/a73KY-019-04473KY-019-044Marrowbone3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MARROWBONE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MARROWBONE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MARROWBONE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MARROWBONE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MARROWBONE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MARROWBONE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MARROWBONE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MARROWBONE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KY-2010-09-03-12 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Handshoe-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Marrowbone general soil map unit in Knott County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

  2. KY-2010-09-03-17 | Lawrence and Martin Counties - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils, parent material, and topography in the Udorthents-Nelse-Allegheny and Shelocta-Hazleton-Blairton general soil map units. The Udorthents-Nelse-Allegheny general soil map unit is along the Tug and Lavista Forks of the Big Sandy River and their major tributaries, and the Shelocta-Hazleton-Blairton general soil map unit is on the mountains (Soil Survey of Lawrence and Martin Counties, Kentucky; 2005).

  3. KY-2010-09-03-18 | Lawrence and Martin Counties - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils, parent material, and topography in the Hazleton-Shelocta-Fiveblock and Grigsby-Shelocta-Orrville general soil map units. The Hazleton-Shelocta-Fiveblock general soil map unit is on the mountains and in the surface mined areas, and the Grigsby-Shelocta-Orrville general soil map unit is in the valleys (Soil Survey of Lawrence and Martin Counties, Kentucky; 2005).

  4. KY-2010-09-03-36 | Estill and Lee Counties - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Gilpin general soil map unit in Lee County (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; 2007).

  5. KY-2010-09-03-39 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Helechawa-Gilpin-Hazleton general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  6. KY-2010-09-03-40 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Pope-Helechawa-Gilpin general soil map unit in Magoffin County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  7. KY-2010-09-03-41 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Kimper-Shelocta-Fedscreek-Gilpin general soil map unit in Magoffin County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  8. KY-2010-09-03-42 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Gilpin-Latham-Marrowbone general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  9. KY-2010-09-03-43 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Gilpin-Shelocta-Latham general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  10. KY-2010-09-03-46 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Gilpin-Allegheny-Grigsby general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  11. KY-2010-09-27-01 | Floyd and Johnson Counties - 2000

    Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Fedscreek-Hazleton-Shelocta-Gilpin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).

  12. KY-2012-01-30-01 | Floyd and Johnson Counties - 2000

    Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Hazleton-Fedscreek-Dekalb-Marrowbone general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).

  13. KY-2012-01-30-02 | Floyd and Johnson Counties - 2000

    Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Hazleton-Sharondale-Dekalb-Marrowbone general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).

  14. KY-2012-01-30-03 | Floyd and Johnson Counties - 2000

    Relationship of soils to topography and geology in the Fedscreek-Hazleton-Shelocta-Gilpin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Floyd and Johnson Counties, Kentucky; 2000).

  15. KY-2012-02-01-37 | Pike County - June 1990

    Along the Levisa and Russell Forks of the Big Sandy River, the soils in the valleys are in the Nelse-Shelbiana-Udorthents general soil map unit and those on the mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).

  16. KY-2012-02-01-38 | Pike County - June 1990

    Along the major tributaries in Pike County, the soils on the mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb general soil map unit and those in the valleys are in the Yeager-Grigsby-Potomac-Hayter map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).

  17. KY-2012-02-01-39 | Pike County - June 1990

    Along Elkhorn Creek and Pine Mountain, the upper faulted mountains are in the Kimper-Sharondale-Berks-Shelocta general soil map unit, the lower mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb map unit, and the valley is in the Yeager-Grigsby-Potomac-Hayter map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).

  18. VA-2010-11-05-06 | Buchanan County -

    Diagram of a sequence of residual, colluvial, and alluvial soils. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia).

  19. VA-2010-11-05-07 | Buchanan County -

    Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia).

  20. VA-2010-11-05-14 | Dickenson County - 2009

    An idealized cross-section of the north-central section of the survey area showing the relationship among landforms, geology, and soils. Geology adapted from "Geology of the Virginia Portion of the Clintwood and Jenkings East Quadrangles" (Diffenbach, 1988) (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

  21. VA-2010-11-05-15 | Dickenson County - 2009

    Diagram of a sequence of residual, colluvial, and alluvial soils. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

  22. VA-2010-11-05-16 | Dickenson County - 2009

    Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

  23. VA-2010-11-05-17 | Dickenson County - 2009

    Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

  24. VA-2010-11-05-31 | Russell County - 2007

    Diagram of a sequence of landform positions in the Appalachian Plateau area of Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).

  25. VA-2012-05-10-03 | Buchanan County - 2009

    Diagram of a sequence of residual, colluvial, and alluvial soils. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia; 2009).

  26. VA-2012-05-10-04 | Buchanan County - 2009

    An illustration of an area that has been surface-mined for coal that shows a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia; 2009).

  27. VA-2012-05-10-05 | Buchanan County - 2009

    An illustration of an area that has been surface-mined for coal that shows a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia; 2009).

  28. VA-2012-05-11-02 | Dickenson County - 2009

    Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

  29. VA-2012-05-11-03 | Dickenson County - 2009

    Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

  30. VA-2012-05-11-04 | Dickenson County - 2009

    An idealized cross-section of the north-central section of the survey area showing the relationship among landforms, geology, and soils. Geology adapted from “Geology of the Virginia Portion of the Clintwood and Jenkins East Quadrangles” (Diffenbach, 1988) (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

  31. VA-2012-05-11-11 | Russell County - 2007

    Diagram of a sequence of landform positions in the Appalachian Plateau area of Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).

Map Units

Map units containing MARROWBONE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Matewan-Marrowbone-Latham complex, 20 to 80 percent slopes, very rockyDmE480615503402tqh8ky02519911:24000
Matewan-Gilpin-Marrowbone complex, 12 to 80 percent slopes, very rockyuMgmF3109731584472yksrky02519911:24000
Blairton-Cruze-Marrowbone complex, 12 to 25 percent slopesBlD18134188468121855ky06320071:12000
Marrowbone-Blairton-Matewan complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, rockyMaF2589188468221856ky06320071:12000
Blairton-Cruze-Marrowbone complex, 6 to 12 percent slopesBlC540188468021854ky06320071:12000
Marrowbone-Clifftop-Matewan complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes, very rockyMaF1515055500392tqhcky19519861:24000
Fedscreek-Marrowbone-Dekalb complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyFmF46249550031lgbyky19519861:24000
Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Myra complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyMmF18755550040lgc7ky19519861:24000
Fedscreek-Gilpin-Marrowbone complex, 20 to 50 percent slopesFgE4656550030lgbxky19519861:24000
Berks-Rock outcrop-Marrowbone complex, 60 to 120 percent slopesBrG4432550027lgbtky19519861:24000
Gilpin-Marrowbone complex, 6 to 20 percent slopesGmD548550032lgbzky19519861:24000
Gilpin-Latham-Marrowbone complex, 12 to 55 percent slopes, rockyGmF7107557764lqddky61620041:24000
Matewan-Gilpin-Marrowbone complex, 12 to 80 percent slopes, very rockyuMgmF388375507282yksrky62619971:24000
Matewan-Marrowbone-Latham complex, 20 to 80 percent slopes, very rockyDLF1262335521422tqh8ky63319791:24000
Matewan-Gilpin-Marrowbone complex, 12 to 80 percent slopes, very rockyuMgmF845875508602yksrky63919911:24000
Gilpin-Fedscreek-Marrowbone complex, 20 to 60 percent slopesGfF18699550866lh6wky63919911:24000
Rayne-Marrowbone-Dekalb complex, 20 to 80 percent slopes, very rockyRaF48755550911lh8bky64019961:24000
Marrowbone-Blairton-Dekalb complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, rockyMaF22141550908lh87ky64019961:24000
Blairton-Cruze-Marrowbone complex, 12 to 25 percent slopesBlD16756550891lh7pky64019961:24000
Blairton-Cruze-Marrowbone complex, 6 to 12 percent slopesBlC729550890lh7nky64019961:24000
Gilpin-Latham-Marrowbone complex, 20 to 60 percent slopesGnF68007550937lh95ky64119941:24000
Matewan-Gilpin-Marrowbone complex, 12 to 80 percent slopes, very rockyuMgmF214675509312yksrky64119941:24000
Marrowbone-Gilpin-Latham complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesMgE10699550946lh9gky64119941:24000
Marrowbone-Clifftop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes17F2061716709482tqh9va02720061:24000
Marrowbone-Gilpin complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes17E1161116709471t2rjva02720061:24000
Marrowbone-Gilpin complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes17D249616709461t2rhva02720061:24000
Wharton-Gilpin-Marrowbone complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes32C71116709421t2rcva02720061:24000
Marrowbone-Clifftop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes18F1298323998782tqh9va05120081:24000
Marrowbone-Gilpin complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes18E902723998772lk8dva05120081:24000
Marrowbone-Gilpin complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes18D823023998762lk8cva05120081:24000
Marrowbone-Gilpin complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes18C215223998752lk8bva05120081:24000
Marrowbone fine sandy loam, 35 to 55 percent slopes, very stony38E403116712251t31hva16720061:24000
Marrowbone fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony38D391016718851t3qsva16720061:24000
Marrowbone fine sandy loam, 55 to 70 percent slopes, very stony38F390116718871t3qvva16720061:24000
Marrowbone-Gilpin complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes39D86316719011t3r9va16720061:24000
Marrowbone-Gilpin complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes39E18916719021t3rbva16720061:24000
Marrowbone-Clifftop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes39F18816719032tqh9va16720061:24000
Wharton-Gilpin-Marrowbone complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes60C2416718911t3qzva16720061:24000
Marrowbone-Gilpin complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes49E639925085782q7qvva19520101:24000
Marrowbone-Clifftop complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes49G566425085792tqh9va19520101:24000
Marrowbone-Gilpin complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes49D125925085772q7qtva19520101:24000
Marrowbone-Gilpin complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes49C110125085762q7qsva19520101:24000
Clifftop-Marrowbone complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesCmD358524543102ncx9wv70520091:24000
Clifftop-Marrowbone complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesCmC171024543092ncx8wv70520091:24000
Clifftop-Marrowbone complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesCmB28624543082ncx7wv70520091:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MARROWBONE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .