Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MANSKER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MANSKER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MANSKER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
77C00P012999TX153003Mansker7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.9616661,-101.4347229

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MANSKER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MANSKER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MANSKER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MANSKER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MANSKER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MANSKER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MANSKER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MANSKER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KS-2012-01-23-05 | Ford County - August 1965

    A geologic cross section west of Dodge City showing the major soil associations in Ford County (Soil Survey of Ford County, Kansas; 1965).

  2. KS-2012-01-23-23 | Greeley County - December 1961

    Approximate geologic cross section (north and south) through central Greeley County (Soil Survey of Greeley County, Kansas; 1961).

  3. KS-2012-01-23-43 | Kearny County - November 1963

    Cross section of the county showing the relationship of some of the soils of the uplands to the parent material and topography (Soil Survey of Kearny County, Kansas; 1963).

  4. KS-2012-01-26-30 | Wichita County - November 1965

    Cross section of association 2 along White Woman Creek (Soil Survey of Wichita County, Kansas; 1965).

  5. KS-2012-01-26-31 | Wichita County - November 1965

    Relationship of soils to the landscape and to the common parent materials of Wichita County (Soil Survey of Wichita County, Kansas; 1965).

  6. NM-2012-02-14-17 | Portales Area - May 1959

    Relative position and underlying material of main soils of Portales Valley: A, B, Mansker (shallow) and Potter (very shallow), underlain by rocky caliche and High Plains marl. C, Church, underlain by strongly calcareous lake sediments. D, Drake, underlain by strongly calcareous sediments from lakebeds. E, F, Arch and Portales, underlain by strongly calcareous valley fill of mixed wind- and water-deposited materials. G, Blackwater, underlain by valley fill and, in turn, by hard caliche at moderate depths. H, Clovis, underlain by mixed water- and wind-deposited sediments from the High Plains upland. I, J, K, Kimbrough, Amarillo, and Arvana, underlain by mixed water- and wind-deposited materials from the High Plains upland; Kimbrough soils underlain by hard caliche at shallow depth, and Arvana soils by hard caliche at moderate depth. L, M, Springer (deep) and Tivoli (very deep), underlain by wind-deposited sands (Soil Survey of Portales Area, New Mexico; May 1959).

  7. NM-2012-02-15-01 | Roosevelt County - March 1967

    Generalized diagram of soil patterns that extend southwest to northeast through Roosevelt County (Soil Survey of Roosevelt County, New Mexico; March 1967).

  8. NM-2012-02-15-02 | Southwest Quay Area - May 1960

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material at Blanco Creek on the High Plains. Pullman soils are on gentle slopes at the top of the divide, and Mansker soils are in rolling areas leading to the stream channel (Soil Survey of Southwest Quay Area, New Mexico; May 1960).

  9. OK-2012-02-16-03 | Beaver County - August 1962

    Parent material and parent rock of most of the soils in Beaver County, and their position on the landscape (Soil Survey of Beaver County, Oklahoma; August 1962).

  10. OK-2012-02-16-09 | Cimarron County - June 1960

    Typical landscape in the central and eastern part of Cimarron County: Associations 1, 2, 3, and 5 (Soil Survey of Cimarron County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

  11. OK-2012-02-16-30 | Ellis County - April 1966

    Major soils of associations 7, 8, and 10 (Soil Survey of Ellis County, Oklahoma; April 1966).

  12. OK-2012-02-16-47 | Harper County - June 1960

    A schematic drawing showing a normal pattern of soils formed on limy outwash. The typical slope range is given for each soil (Soil Survey of Harper County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

  13. OK-2012-02-17-52 | Texas County - July 1961

    Typical pattern of the soils in association 1, Texas County, Okla (Soil Survey of Texas County, Oklahoma; July 1961).

  14. OK-2012-02-17-53 | Texas County - July 1961

    Typical pattern of the soils in association 3, Texas County, Okla (Soil Survey of Texas County, Oklahoma; July 1961).

  15. TX-2012-03-20-01 | Bailey County - April 1963

    Amarillo fine sandy loam association (Soil Survey of Bailey County, TX; 1963).

  16. TX-2012-03-20-05 | Bailey County - April 1963

    Soils and underlying formations associated with a saline lake in Bailey County (Soil Survey of Bailey County, TX; 1963).

  17. TX-2012-03-20-10 | Carson County - July 1962

    General relationship of the soils in Carson County (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  18. TX-2012-03-20-11 | Carson County - July 1962

    A representative pattern of soils in one of the playas of the Pullman-Randall soil association (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  19. TX-2012-03-20-12 | Carson County - July 1962

    Several major soils of the Canadian River Valley of the Rolling Plains. The ranges in slope shown on this figure are those that exist where the figure was drawn (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  20. TX-2012-03-20-13 | Carson County - July 1962

    Typical arrangement of soils in the Mansker-Potter-Berthoud sandy loams complex. The dashed lines indicate boundaries of the component soils (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  21. TX-2012-03-20-14 | Carson County - July 1962

    Soil toposequence of playas (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  22. TX-2012-03-20-15 | Carson County - July 1962

    Soil toposequence of the escarpment separating the High Plains from the Rolling Plains (Soil Survey of Carson County, TX; 1962).

  23. TX-2012-03-20-37 | Dawson County - August 1960

    Soils in ancient drain on high plains and associated soils (Soil Survey of Dawson County, TX; 1960).

  24. TX-2012-03-20-38 | Dawson County - August 1960

    Soils on caprock and associated soils on high plains and rolling plains (Soil Survey of Dawson County, TX; 1960).

  25. TX-2012-03-20-40 | Deaf Smith County - August 1968

    Patterns of soils around a playa on the High Plains (Soil Survey of Deaf Smith County, TX; 1968).

  26. TX-2012-03-21-04 | Hansford County - June 1960

    Diagram showing typical locations of soil series and the underlying parent material (Soil Survey of Hansford County, TX; 1960).

  27. TX-2012-03-21-19 | Lamb County - March 1962

    Some soils of general soil area 1 (Soil Survey of Lamb County, TX; 1962).

  28. TX-2012-03-21-20 | Lamb County - March 1962

    Some soils of general soil area 2 (Soil Survey of Lamb County, TX; 1962).

  29. TX-2012-03-21-22 | Lamb County - March 1962

    Some soils of general soil area 7 (Soil Survey of Lamb County, TX; 1962).

  30. TX-2012-03-21-23 | Lamb County - March 1962

    Soils and underlying formations surrounding a saline lake (now Bull and Illusion Lakes) (Soil Survey of Lamb County, TX; 1962).

  31. TX-2012-03-21-34 | Lipscomb County - December 1975

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in association 1 (Soil Survey of Lipscomb County, TX; 1975).

  32. TX-2012-03-21-91 | Terry County - February 1962

    Soils in an ancient drain and associated soils (Soil Survey of Terry County, TX; 1962).

  33. TX-2012-03-22-07 | Wheeler County - October 1975

    Relationship of soils in the Abilene-Mobeetie-Berda association to parent material and relief (Soil Survey of Wheeler County, TX; 1975).

Map Units

Map units containing MANSKER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Mansker-Portales association, gently slopingMA22953376361dmmpnm02119681:31680
Mansker-Portales association, cool, 0 to 9 percent slopesMAcD543931561892xxx0nm02119681:31680
Mansker-Potter association, cool, 1 to 9 percent slopesMKcD425031561902xxx2nm02119681:31680
Mansker-Potter association, gently slopingMK4216376362dmmqnm02119681:31680
Mansker loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesMa89053764492tw32nm02519671:20000
Mansker loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMe50863764502tw33nm02519671:20000
Mansker loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesMK638376444dmqcnm02519671:20000
Mansker loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMkC134503624792tw35tx01119631:20000
Mansker loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMkB9513624782tw33tx01119631:20000
Mansker loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, erodedMkC2151362480d55xtx01119631:20000
Mansker fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMfB47423625932tw30tx01719601:20000
Mansker fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesMfA20613625922tw2ztx01719601:20000
Mansker fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMfC19883625942tw31tx01719601:20000
Mansker loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesMkA6083625952tw32tx01719601:20000
Mansker loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMkB1963625962tw33tx01719601:20000
Mansker-Berda loams, 5 to 8 percent slopesMbD4645363768d6jgtx06919691:20000
Mansker-Potter complex, 1 to 30 percent slopesMl518763647222yk8qtx10719641:20000
Mansker fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMaC108213647182tw31tx10719641:20000
Mansker loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMkB22463647202tw33tx10719641:20000
Mansker fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMaB18183647172tw30tx10719641:20000
Mansker loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMkC11013647212tw35tx10719641:20000
Mansker loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesMkA6773647192tw32tx10719641:20000
Mansker fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesMaA4863647162tw2ztx10719641:20000
Berda-Mansker complex, 3 to 8 percent slopesBmD32233651103093ttx12519651:20000
Mansker loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMcB26423651242tw33tx12519651:20000
Mansker loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMcC14053651252tw35tx12519651:20000
Mansker clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMkC38016959561t1zjtx15320041:24000
Mansker clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMkB14656959551t1zktx15320041:24000
Mansker loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMaB35463783352tw33tx16919651:24000
Mansker loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMaC7043783362tw35tx16919651:24000
Mansker loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesMaA2193783342tw32tx16919651:24000
Mansker clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMaC240173919231t1zjtx17919651:20000
Mansker clay loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesMaD23919391924f4tqtx17919651:20000
Mansker clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMaB46463919221t1zktx17919651:20000
Mansker loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesMkB81233669062tw34tx18919691:20000
Mansker loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMkC60203669072tw35tx18919691:20000
Berda and Mansker loams, 3 to 6 percent slopesBmC16438367546dbgbtx21119671:20000
Mansker loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMcB1418367568dbh1tx21119671:20000
Mansker loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMkB138933918902tw33tx22719651:24000
Mansker loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMkC15213918912tw35tx22719651:24000
Mansker loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesMkA558391889f4sltx22719651:24000
Mansker loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMkB24963942842tw33tx27919601:20000
Mansker fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesMfD2169394279f78ptx27919601:20000
Mansker fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMfC18743942782tw31tx27919601:20000
Mansker fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesMfA17973942762tw2ztx27919601:20000
Mansker loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesMkA13023942802tw32tx27919601:20000
Mansker loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMkC8633942862tw35tx27919601:20000
Mansker loam, 5 to 8 percent slopesMkD30839428830948tx27919601:20000
Mansker loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMcB5819369460ddg2tx29519711:24000
Mansker clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesMkB48413698441t1zktx30319751:20000
Mansker clay loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesMkC6863698451t1zjtx30319751:20000
Mansker loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesMaB3185370339dfcftx31719681:24000
Posey-Mansker complex, 3 to 5 percent slopesPnC1351370889dfy5tx34519721:24000
Mansker and Estacado soils, 1 to 3 percent slopesMeB24965372338dhfxtx43719701:20000
Mansker and Estacado soils, 0 to 1 percent slopesMeA14463372337dhfwtx43719701:20000
Mansker and Pep soils, 3 to 5 percent slopesMeC5635372339dhfytx43719701:20000
Mansker-Tulia complex, 5 to 8 percent slopesMtD2116372340dhfztx43719701:20000
Mansker and Quanah soils, 3 to 5 percent slopesMaC1935373313djgctx48319701:24000
Mansker and Quanah soils, 1 to 3 percent slopesMaB1236373312djgbtx48319701:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MANSKER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .