Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the MAGNOLIA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of MAGNOLIA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to MAGNOLIA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
149A01P0063S2000MD017008Magnolia7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.4408611,-77.1926111

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the MAGNOLIA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the MAGNOLIA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MAGNOLIA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MAGNOLIA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with MAGNOLIA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the MAGNOLIA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the MAGNOLIA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with MAGNOLIA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. FL-2012-04-25-01 | Gadsden County - January 1961

    Main geologic formations and other topographic features in a segment of Gadsden County, and the positions of soils in some soil series (Soil Survey of Gadsden County, Florida; January 1961).

  2. SC-2012-03-14-01 | Bamberg County - January 1966

    Soil series in soil association 1 and their relation to the landscape and the underlying material (Soil Survey of Bamberg County, SC; 1966).

  3. SC-2012-03-14-12 | Calhoun County - 1963

    Major soils of the Magnolia-Faceville-Ruston soil association and their relationship to the landscape (Soil Survey of Calhoun County, SC; 1963).

  4. SC-2012-03-14-20 | Lee County - March 1963

    Major soils in soil association 1 and their general location on the landscape (Soil Survey of Lee County, SC; 1963).

  5. SC-2012-03-14-33 | Saluda County - August 1962

    Landscape showing association of Coastal Plain soils in the ridge section (Soil Survey of Saluda County, SC; 1962).

Map Units

Map units containing MAGNOLIA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Magnolia fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesMgA3780328170c0h4al00319611:20000
Magnolia fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesMgB995328171c0h5al00319611:20000
Magnolia fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedMgB2508328172c0h6al00319611:20000
Magnolia fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, erodedMgC2400328173c0h7al00319611:20000
Red Bay and Magnolia fine sandy loams, eroded, very gently slopingRcB23041329019c1cjal04519581:20000
Magnolia fine sandy loam, levelMaA2580328996c1bsal04519581:20000
Magnolia fine sandy loam, eroded, very gently slopingMaB22141328997c1btal04519581:20000
Red Bay and Magnolia fine sandy loams, eroded, gently slopingRcC21859329020c1ckal04519581:20000
Red Bay and Magnolia fine sandy loams, eroded, slopingRcD2808329021c1clal04519581:20000
Red Bay and Magnolia sandy clay loams, severely eroded, gently slopingRdC3781329022c1cmal04519581:20000
Magnolia fine sandy loam, eroded, gently slopingMaC2301328998c1bval04519581:20000
Magnolia sandy clay loam, severely eroded, slopingMbD3203329000c1bxal04519581:20000
Magnolia sandy clay loam, severely eroded, gently slopingMbC3117328999c1bwal04519581:20000
Magnolia fine sandy loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes, erodedMaC2395329467c1tzal05719631:15840
Shubuta-Magnolia-Falaya association, hillySNE62262329700c22hal06320131:
Magnolia fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, erodedMgC24938329678c21sal06320131:
Magnolia fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedMgB24706329677c21ral06320131:
Magnolia sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, severely erodedMnC33430329680c21val06320131:
Magnolia fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesMgA1837329676c21qal06320131:
Magnolia fine sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes, erodedMgD21401329679c21tal06320131:
Magnolia sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedMxB22075325044bx79ga28919601:20000
Magnolia sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, erodedMxC2625325045bx7bga28919601:20000
Magnolia sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesMxA110325043bx78ga28919601:20000
Magnolia-Grosstown complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesMcE145116086621qzybmd01720071:12000
Magnolia silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesMaB140516086581qzy6md01720071:12000
Magnolia silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesMaA69516086571qzy5md01720071:12000
Magnolia-Grosstown complex, 10 to 15 percent slopesMcD65416086611qzy9md01720071:12000
Magnolia silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopesMaC51516086591qzy7md01720071:12000
Magnolia-Grosstown complex, 5 to 10 percent slopesMcC21316086601qzy8md01720071:12000
Magnolia-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesMbB13424748642p29bmd03320091:12000
Magnolia silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesMaB5124748632p299md03320091:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the MAGNOLIA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .