Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LUPINTO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LUPINTO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LUPINTO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LUPINTO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LUPINTO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LUPINTO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LUPINTO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LUPINTO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LUPINTO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LUPINTO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LUPINTO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing LUPINTO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Lupinto, moist, stony-Breece, dry families association, 2 to 30 percent slopes52416235512503k69cut6461:24000
Bruman, stony-Lupinto, very stony families complex, moist, 25 to 60 percent slopes52912111512501k699ut6461:24000
Lupinto-Bruman families-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 40 percent slopes, stony6088713512535k6bdut6461:24000
Lupinto-Coaldale families complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes, stony6045261512538k6bhut6461:24000
Lupinto, stony-Zillman, dry families complex, 0 to 40 percent slopes6054886512537k6bgut6461:24000
Lupinto-Bruman families-Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 60 percent slopes, stony6071527512536k6bfut6461:24000
Alcova, shallow substratum-Lupinto-Dahlquist complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes10321809501618jtz7wy60119911:24000
Lupinto family, steep1978616697101t1gmwy60920061:24000
Brownsto-Lupinto complex, 6 to 40 percent slopes13738353502215jvlhwy62519851:24000
Lupinto family, steep21825809502327jvq3wy62519851:24000
Lupinto-Alcova complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes21718745502325jvq1wy62519851:24000
Worfstone-McFadden-Lupinto complex, 6 to 50 percent slopes3084723502453jvv5wy62519851:24000
Forelle-Lupinto association, rolling1851303502273jvncwy62519851:24000
Lupinto-Zillman complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes -- Draft613AD15262253t9wy6291:24000
Lupinto very gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes -- Draft613A15262153t8wy6291:24000
Lupinto very gravelly loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes -- Draft613B15262353tbwy6291:24000
Lupinto-Rock River loams, 1 to 25 percent slopes0391702215754858y6wy6471:24000
Lupinto loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes038336715754958y7wy6471:24000
Lupinto loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes170D131884371217v5wy65620081:24000
Lupinto clay loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes3253801590765bjhwy67719751:24000
Lupinto clay loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes347321590745bjfwy67719751:24000
Lupinto clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes336691590755bjgwy67719751:24000
Lupinto clay loam, saline354941590735bjdwy67719751:24000
Lupinto loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes1702087503035jwfywy71319861:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LUPINTO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .