Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LUCKY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LUCKY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LUCKY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
48A40A3889S1959CO051002Lucky6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.4402771,-106.8447189

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LUCKY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LUCKY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LUCKY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LUCKY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LUCKY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LUCKY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LUCKY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LUCKY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CO-2012-05-09-05 | Gunnison Area; Parts of Gunnison, Hinsdale, and Saguache Counties - August 1975

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in associations 2, 3, 4, and 6 (Soil Survey of Gunnison Area, Colorado, Parts of Gunnison, Hinsdale, and Saguache Counties; August 1975).

Map Units

Map units containing LUCKY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Lucky gravelly sandy loam, 25 to 65 percent slopesLuF5979509757k3fsco66119681:31680
Lucky gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 25 percent slopesLuE2742509756k3frco66119681:31680
Lucky-Beenom, exposed complex, 5 to 45 percent slopes2GB211368332026312zbtsco66219681:24000
Rogert-Lucky complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes, very stony5375065825314372qmg4wy6301:24000
Rogert, very stony-Rock outcrop-Lucky, very stony complex, 10 to 45 percent slopes5381046925314382qmg5wy6301:24000
Bavdark-Lucky complex, 3 to 25 percent slopes, stony539562625314392qmg6wy6301:24000
Lucky-Burgess-Hazton associaiton, 8 to 30 percent slopes174668361166d3tjwy63319871:24000
Southeast Mountains Sideslopes, Big Sagebrush-Limber Pine Complex762011552554711532cwy6351:24000
Lucky-Burgess-Hazton association, 2 to 30 percent slopes252843715803659fywy65019821:24000
Southeast Mountains Sideslopes, Big Sagebrush-Limber Pine Complex76202185151911532cwy66219981:24000
Southeast Mountains Pediments, Big Sagebrush Complex72215251519015321wy66219981:24000
Southeast Mountains Sideslopes, Big Sagebrush-Limber Pine Complex7620762925087532cwy71319861:24000
Lucky-Burgess-Hazton association, 2 to 30 percent slopes9971119715408981nqfdwy71920131:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LUCKY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .