Soil Data Explorer - LUCIEN

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LUCIEN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LUCIEN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LUCIEN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
79	96KS155311	96KS155311	Lucien	1	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	37.8055,-98.1271973
80A	73-OK-60-2	73-OK119-60-2	Lucien	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	36.1292278,-97.0975
80A	91P0908	S1991OK103001	Lucien	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	36.4133339,-97.1652756
84A	76-OK-52-2	76-OK103-52-2	Lucien	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	36.1686306,-97.2271361

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LUCIEN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LUCIEN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the LUCIEN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the LUCIEN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LUCIEN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the LUCIEN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LUCIEN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LUCIEN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. KS-2012-01-25-17 | Reno County - March 1966

   Cross section of the Nash-Lucien association in the south-central part of the county (Soil Survey of Reno County, Kansas; 1966).

2. OK-2010-09-29-02 | Logan County - 2006

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Ashport-Pulaski-Lawrie general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Logan County, Oklahoma; 2006).

3. OK-2010-09-29-07 | Noble County - 2005

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Grainola-Lucien-Masham general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Noble County, Oklahoma; 2005).

4. OK-2010-09-29-09 | Noble County - 2005

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Port-Ashport-Pulaski general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Noble County, Oklahoma; 2005).

5. OK-2010-09-29-10 | Noble County - 2005

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Teller-Konawa general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Noble County, Oklahoma; 2005).

6. OK-2010-09-29-11 | Noble County - 2005

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Darnell-Grainola-Newalla-Harrah general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Noble County, Oklahoma; 2005).

7. OK-2010-09-29-12 | Noble County - 2005

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Norge-Bethany-Kirkland general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Noble County, Oklahoma; 2005).

8. OK-2012-02-16-04 | Blaine County - February 1968

   Typical pattern of soils in associations 1, 3, 4, and 6 (Soil Survey of Blaine County, Oklahoma; February 1968).

9. OK-2012-02-16-05 | Blaine County - February 1968

   Typical pattern of soils in associations 7 and 8 (Soil Survey of Blaine County, Oklahoma; February 1968).

10. OK-2012-02-16-12 | Cleveland County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Renfrow-Grainola-Grant map unit and the Port-Weswood map unit (Soil Survey of Cleveland County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

11. OK-2012-02-16-20 | Cotton County - December 1963

    Typical pattern of Zaneis, Lucien, and associated soils in the northeastern part of Cotton County (Soil Survey of Cotton County, Oklahoma; December 1963).

12. OK-2012-02-16-23 | Cotton County - December 1963

    Schematic diagram showing the location of the Chickasha and other extensive soils in the east-central part of Cotton County (Soil Survey of Cotton County, Oklahoma; December 1963).

13. OK-2012-02-17-01 | Lincoln County - January 1970

    Typical pattern of soils in associations 1 and 2 (Soil Survey of Lincoln County, Oklahoma; January 1970).

14. OK-2012-02-17-02 | Lincoln County - January 1970

    Typical pattern of soils in association 3 (Soil Survey of Lincoln County, Oklahoma; January 1970).

15. OK-2012-02-17-03 | Logan County - June 1960

    Soils of the Zaneis-Lucien-Chickasha and the Renfrow-Vernon-Kirkland associations on red clays, sandstone, siltstone, and alluvium. They have developed largely on the Wellington, Garber, and Hennessey formations that dip successively toward the west (Soil Survey of Logan County, Oklahoma; June 1960).

16. OK-2012-02-17-14 | Oklahoma County - February 1969

    Typical pattern of soils in soil association 1 (Soil Survey of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma; February 1969).

17. OK-2012-02-17-22 | Pawnee County - March 1959

    Prairie soils of western Pawnee County formed in clay and sandy strata of the Permian "redbeds" area, and in accompanying alluvium (Soil Survey of Pawnee County, Oklahoma; March 1959).

18. OK-2012-02-17-26 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Agra-Coyle and Steedman-Lucien-Grainola map units (Soil Survey of Payne County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

19. OK-2012-02-17-27 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Renfrow-Coyle-Grainola map unit (Soil Survey of Payne County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

20. OK-2012-02-17-28 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Grainola-Masham-Lucien map unit (Soil Survey of Payne County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

21. OK-2012-02-17-29 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Stephenville-Darnell map unit (Soil Survey of Payne County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

22. OK-2012-02-17-51 | Stephens County - 1964

    Typical pattern of soils in associations 6, 7, and 8 (Soil Survey of Stephens County, Oklahoma; 1964).

Map Units

Map units containing LUCIEN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Nash-Lucien silt loams, 7 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded	6386	2286	1443867	2ywsb	ks155	1999	1:24000
Nash-Lucien silt loams, 3 to 7 percent slopes	6385	763	1443866	2yws9	ks155	1999	1:24000
Lucien-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes	Lr	11685	381741	dt77	ok011	1965	1:24000
Kingfisher-Lucien complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	KhD2	8472	381732	dt6y	ok011	1965	1:24000
Lucien-Grainola-Zaneis complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LzD	36012	382191	dtpr	ok031	1965	1:24000
Zaneis-Grainola-Lucien complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes	Lz	16242	382237	dtr7	ok033	1961	1:24000
Steedman-Lucien complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes, very rocky	StLE	764	2516358	1t800	ok037	1952	1:24000
Foraker-Shidler-Lucien complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes, very rocky	FSLE	744	2516366	1t7yn	ok037	1952	1:24000
Lucien-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes	LrE	14835	382327	dtv4	ok039	1973	1:24000
Lucien-Nash complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	21	72180	382640	dv57	ok051	1975	1:24000
Nash-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	30	23580	382650	dv5k	ok051	1975	1:24000
Zaneis, Lucien, and Grainola soils, 5 to 12 percent slopes	ZvD	107302	383269	2xm2m	ok067	1967	1:24000
Kingfisher-Lucien complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	KgD3	10329	383395	dvyl	ok073	1960	1:24000
Masham-Lucien complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes	VeF	9389	383543	dw3c	ok081	1966	1:24000
Grainola-Lucien complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	GrLE	209	383622	2wrk2	ok083	1994	1:12000
Grainola-Masham-Lucien complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes, very bouldery	GMLG	46	383614	2wrk3	ok083	1994	1:12000
Nash-Lucien complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	33	63433	383790	dwcb	ok087	1976	1:24000
Nash-Lucien complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes	32	13341	383789	dwc9	ok087	1976	1:24000
Grainola-Lucien complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	GrLE	34415	384059	2wrk2	ok103	1994	1:24000
Grainola-Masham-Lucien complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes, very bouldery	GMLG	21814	384052	2wrk3	ok103	1994	1:24000
Grainola-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	GrLC	17674	384058	dwmz	ok103	1994	1:24000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	CoLC	5717	384040	dwmd	ok103	1994	1:24000
Kingfisher-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	KgLC	3636	384067	2tq6f	ok103	1994	1:24000
Steedman-Lucien complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes	57	116942	623452	nxrc	ok113	1975	1:24000
Lucien-Coyle complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes	13	75423	623408	nxpy	ok113	1975	1:24000
Steedman-Lucien complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes	58	31915	623453	nxrd	ok113	1975	1:24000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes	60	9796	623455	nxrg	ok113	1975	1:24000
Foraker-Shidler-Lucien complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes, very rocky	FSLE	27463	1675942	1t7yn	ok117	2007	1:24000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	CoLC	13245	1423150	1jrx2	ok117	2007	1:24000
Grainola-Shidler-Lucien complex, 1 to 20 percent slopes, very rocky	GSLF	12967	1675936	1t7yg	ok117	2007	1:24000
Grainola-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	GrLC	12681	1677338	1t9dp	ok117	2007	1:24000
Grainola-Lucien complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	GrLE	11992	1423157	2wrk2	ok117	2007	1:24000
Steedman-Lucien complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes, very rocky	StLE	10897	1675984	1t800	ok117	2007	1:24000
Grainola-Rock outcrop-Lucien complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes	GRLF	6328	1675908	1t7xk	ok117	2007	1:24000
Steedman-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes, very rocky	StLC	5311	1677022	1t92h	ok117	2007	1:24000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes, eroded, very rocky	CoLC2	2917	1677024	1t92k	ok117	2007	1:24000
Steedman-Lucien complex, 12 to 45 percent slopes, very rocky	StLG	1025	1675985	1t801	ok117	2007	1:24000
Grainola-Masham-Lucien complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes, very bouldery	GMLG	22	1883786	2wrk3	ok117	2007	1:24000
Grainola-Lucien complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	GrLE	21975	1907386	2wrk2	ok119	1983	1:24000
Foraker-Shidler-Lucien complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes, very rocky	FSLE	13303	1907654	22127	ok119	1983	1:24000
Grainola-Shidler-Lucien complex, 1 to 20 percent slopes, very rocky	GSLF	12181	1907651	22124	ok119	1983	1:24000
Grainola-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	GrLC	10364	1907385	220sk	ok119	1983	1:24000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	CoLC	4989	1907650	22123	ok119	1983	1:24000
Coyle-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes, eroded, rocky	CoLC2	76	1900516	21smz	ok119	1983	1:24000
Steedman-Lucien complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes, very rocky	StLC	8	1900521	21sn4	ok119	1983	1:24000
Grainola-Lucien complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	18	8749	384803	2wrk2	ok133	1976	1:24000
Zaneis-Grainola-Lucien complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	Lz	37710	384867	dxh2	ok137	1960	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LUCIEN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).