Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LOUISA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LOUISA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LOUISA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
136S92AL-123-4S1992AL123004Louisa3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties33.0547222,-85.695

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LOUISA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LOUISA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LOUISA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LOUISA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LOUISA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LOUISA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LOUISA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LOUISA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. AL-2011-05-27-01 | Randolph County - 1967

    Representative pattern of soils and parent materials (Soil Survey of Randolph County, Alabama; 1967).

  2. AL-2012-04-24-14 | Chambers County - June 1959

    Soil associations of Chambers County, Alabama (Soil Survey of Chambers County, Alabama; June 1959).

Map Units

Map units containing LOUISA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Louisa stony sandy loam, steepLkF191812274743qlal01719571:20000
Louisa gravelly sandy loam, moderately steep and steepLhE115312274643qkal01719571:20000
Madison-Louisa association, steepMLS2567512280343sdal02919741:24000
Madison-Louisa complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, moderately erodedMdE26092018957302tx3sal03720061:24000
Louisa-Mountain Park complex, 30 to 50 percent slopesLoF17141189572521mnfal03720061:24000
Louisa stony sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesLtE798881228562tfgyal11119651:15840
Louisa gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesLgE5004312284943twal11119651:15840
Louisa slaty loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesLoE2192912285143tyal11119651:15840
Louisa gravelly sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesLgD727012284843tval11119651:15840
Louisa stony sandy clay loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes, erodedLsE2302412285443v1al11119651:15840
Louisa stony sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesLtD291012285543v2al11119651:15840
Louisa stony sandy clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, erodedLsD2162012285343v0al11119651:15840
Louisa gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopesLgC157612284743ttal11119651:15840
Louisa slaty loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesLoD135412285043txal11119651:15840
Louisa stony sandy clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, erodedLsC284212285243tzal11119651:15840
Madison-Louisa complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, moderately erodedMdE23193014764302tx3sal12320051:24000
Louisa-Mountain Park complex, 30 to 50 percent slopesLoF139814764231lkbkal12320051:24000
Louisa soils, 25 to 60 percent slopesLNF3758124204457lga06719691:15840
Louisa gravelly sandy loam, 10 to 25 percent slopesLkE3597124205457mga06719691:15840
Louisa fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesLjE1050012625647csga09719601:15840
Louisa fine sandy loam, 25 to 40 percent slopesLjF640012625847cvga09719601:15840
Louisa fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, erodedLjE2212012625747ctga09719601:15840
Louisa fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, erodedLjD2119512625547crga09719601:15840
Louisa fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesLjD97012625447cqga09719601:15840
Louisa fine sandy loam, steep phaseLcF158512435945dlga11719571:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, moderately steep phaseLcE46512435845dkga11719571:20000
Louisa fine sandy clay loam, severely eroded moderately steep phaseLdE344512436045dmga11719571:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, eroded sloping phaseLcD226512435745djga11719571:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, eroded gently sloping phaseLcC223512435645dhga11719571:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, 25 to 60 percent slopesLjF483012451645knga13719601:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesLjE175512451545kmga13719601:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, 60 to 90 percent slopesLjG102012451745kpga13719601:20000
Louisa fine sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely erodedLkE327512451845kqga13719601:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesLjE134912459745n8ga14719611:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesLjD71912459645n7ga14719611:20000
Louisa coarse sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesLEE136012471445s1ga19919601:15840
Louisa coarse sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesLED58012471345s0ga19919601:15840
Louisa coarse sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopesLEC26512471245rzga19919601:15840
Louisa fine sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopesLjF465125051463xga29719621:15840
Madison-Louisa-Tallapoosa complex, 25 to 60 percent slopesMAF1038012527346c2ga60519671:15840
Louisa-Tallapoosa complex, 10 to 25 percent slopesLOE183512526946byga60519671:15840
Louisa gravelly fine sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesLkE202451254462tx3dga61819661:15840
Louisa gravelly fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopesLkD300512544546jmga61819661:15840
Louisa gravelly fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopesLkC79512544446jlga61819661:15840
Madison-Louisa complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, erodedMmE2179512549846lbga62319651:15840
Madison-Louisa complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes, erodedMmD231512549746l9ga62319651:15840
Madison-Louisa complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, erodedMmC23012549646l8ga62319651:15840
Louisa gravelly fine sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesLoF147601256122tx3dga62919761:20000
Louisa gravelly fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesLoD228512561146pzga62919761:20000
Louisa gravelly loam, 10 to 30 percent slopesLoE321112572846trga63619751:20000
Louisa sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopesLsF10214855981lvwjnc03720051:24000
Louisa fine sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopesLoF27791131123spsnc08519841:24000
Louisa fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopesLoF10651187473zkkva03719701:15840
Louisa and Louisburg soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely erodedLsE36561187483zklva03719701:15840
Louisa fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesLoD4421187463zkjva03719701:15840
Louisa loam, variant, 20 to 45 percent slopes505F2601189113zqvva04119741:15840
Louisa loam, variant, 12 to 20 percent slopes505D1481189103zqtva04119741:15840
Louisa loam, hilly and steep phasesLg66112180242r3va06519501:15840
Louisa loam, rolling phaseLh21212180342r4va06519501:15840
Louisa fine sandy loam, eroded hilly phaseLg2195120264414hva14719501:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, eroded rolling phaseLh1405120265414jva14719501:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, eroded undulating phaseLl997120267414lva14719501:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, eroded steep phaseLk579120266414kva14719501:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, severely eroded hilly phaseLm419120268414mva14719501:20000
Louisa fine sandy loam, severely eroded steep phaseLn181120269414nva14719501:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LOUISA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .