Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LOTUSPOINT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LOTUSPOINT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LOTUSPOINT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
43A04N0225S2003ID009007Lotuspoint6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.2919426,-116.628334
43A05N0875S2005ID009001Lotuspoint6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.3493056,-116.4223333

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LOTUSPOINT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LOTUSPOINT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LOTUSPOINT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LOTUSPOINT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LOTUSPOINT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LOTUSPOINT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LOTUSPOINT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LOTUSPOINT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ID-2010-08-31-08 | St. Joe Area, Parts of Benewah and Shoshone Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in general soil map unit 1 (Soil Survey of St. Joe Area, Parts of Benewah and Shoshone Counties, Idaho; 2002).

  2. ID-2011-06-01-16 | St. Joe Area, Parts of Benewah and Shoshone Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in General Soil Map Unit 1 (Soil Survey of St. Joe Area, Parts of Benewah and Shoshone Counties, Idaho; 2002).

Map Units

Map units containing LOTUSPOINT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Typic Vitrixerands family-Rock outcrop-Lotuspoint family, complex, weakly weathered metasedimentary belt geology, stream breaklands, south aspects, dry2lgb06028508762lgb0id60419811:24000
Arson-Lotuspoint complex, 8 to 40 percent slopes3406426629742v72tid60619761:24000
Cassyhill-Lotuspoint complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes7785126630052v72vid60619761:24000
Lotuspoint, stony-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes7363926630001hnj5id60619761:24000
Ardenvoir, dry-Lotuspoint complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes6132126629902v72sid60619761:24000
Lotuspoint stony ashy silt loam, 35 to 65 percent slopes, stony7351526629991hnhhid60619761:24000
Lotuspoint, stony-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes631008815347954pyid60819941:24000
Pinecreek-Lotuspoint, stony complex, strongly acid, 35 to 65 percent slopes, eroded78301415349554qgid60819941:24000
Lotuspoint, very strongly acid-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes, eroded6448815348054pzid60819941:24000
Lotuspoint, stony-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes1hnj54227430751hnj5id60819941:24000
Typic Vitrixerands family-Rock outcrop-Lotuspoint family, complex, weakly weathered metasedimentary belt geology, stream breaklands, south aspects, dry2lgb02529367832lgb0id60819941:24000
Arson-Lotuspoint complex, 8 to 40 percent slopes340258513898392v72tid62020131:24000
Ardenvoir, dry-Lotuspoint complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes614182513899662v72rid62020131:24000
Pinecreek, moist-Lotuspoint complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes7841697186180920hccid62020131:24000
Lotuspoint stony ashy silt loam, 35 to 65 percent slopes, stony735105013900861hnhhid62020131:24000
Cassyhill-Lotuspoint complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes77898113901562v72vid62020131:24000
Ardenvoir, dry-Lotuspoint complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes61358113899652v72sid62020131:24000
Lotuspoint, stony-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes73645113901071hnj5id62020131:24000
Typic Vitrixerands family-Rock outcrop-Lotuspoint family, complex, weakly weathered metasedimentary belt geology, stream breaklands, south aspects, dry4785044623970442lgb0id6701:24000
Lotuspoint, stony-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes54py324285099254pyid6701:24000
Cassyhill-Lotuspoint complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes977861722302452v72vwa06320121:24000
Arson-Lotuspoint complex, 8 to 40 percent slopes934057122302272v72twa06320121:24000
Ardenvoir, dry-Lotuspoint complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes961447222302322v72rwa06320121:24000
Ardenvoir, dry-Lotuspoint complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes961336022302312v72swa06320121:24000
Lotuspoint stony ashy silt loam, 35 to 65 percent slopes, stony surface97355822302412dvr8wa06320121:24000
Cassyhill-Lotuspoint complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes97781426513902dvrdwa07519751:20000
Typic Vitrixerands family-Rock outcrop-Lotuspoint family, complex, weakly weathered metasedimentary belt geology, stream breaklands, south aspects, dry2lgb01928509092lgb0wa65119811:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LOTUSPOINT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .