Soil Data Explorer - LONEWOOD

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LONEWOOD soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LONEWOOD, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LONEWOOD were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
122	89KY-057-009	89KY-057-009	Lonewood	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	36.7436905,-85.2907791
125	97P0402	97TN035005	Lonewood	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	35.8418045,-85.0673599

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LONEWOOD soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LONEWOOD series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the LONEWOOD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the LONEWOOD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LONEWOOD share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the LONEWOOD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the LONEWOOD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LONEWOOD, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. KY-2010-09-03-25 | Cumberland County - 1998

   Relationship of the soils in Garmon-Newbern-Carpenter general soil map unit and the underlying material (Soil Survey of Cumberland County, Kentucky; 1998).

2. KY-2010-09-03-26 | Cumberland County - 1998

   Typical pattern of the soils and the underlying material in the Dewey-Lonewood-Caneyville general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Cumberland County, Kentucky; 1998).

3. TN-2010-11-02-26 | Overton County - 2005

   The relationship of soils and landscapes in the Nella-Talbott and Lonewood-Clarkrange general soil map units (Soil Survey of Overton County, Tennessee; 2005).

4. TN-2010-11-02-29 | Overton County - 2005

   The relationship of soils and landscapes in the Lily-Gilpin and Gilpin-Shelocta-Bouldin general soil map units (Soil Survey of Overton County, Tennessee; 2005).

5. TN-2010-11-02-32 | Rhea County - 2005

   The relationship of soils, geology, and parent materials in the Lily-Gilpin-Ramsey and Gilpin-Allen-Bouldin-Petros general soil map units (Soil Survey of Rhea County, Tennessee; 2005).

6. TN-2012-03-16-11 | Grundy County - 2001

   Typical pattern of soils and the underlying material in the Beersheba-Lonewood-Lily general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Grundy County, TN; 2001).

Map Units

Map units containing LONEWOOD as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Lonewood loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	LoC	303	1592497	1qg3w	ky001	2006	1:12000
Lonewood loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	LoB	154	1592496	1qg3v	ky001	2006	1:12000
Lonewood loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	LoC2	867	552527	ljyg	ky051	1994	1:24000
Lonewood loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	LoB	208	552526	ljyf	ky051	1994	1:24000
Dewey-Lonewood complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes	DmD	13665	551442	lhtg	ky057	1991	1:20000
Caneyville-Lonewood complex, rocky, 6 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	CaD2	7830	551434	lht6	ky057	1991	1:20000
Lonewood silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	LdC2	3280	551458	lhtz	ky057	1991	1:20000
Lonewood silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	LdB	605	551457	lhty	ky057	1991	1:20000
Lonewood loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	LoB	15720	552494	ljxd	ky207	1979	1:20000
Lonewood loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	LoC	4270	552495	ljxf	ky207	1979	1:20000
Lonewood silt loam, 4 to 12 percent slopes	LwC	156	524446	klqm	tn015	1999	1:24000
Caneyville-Lonewood complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes, eroded, rocky	CaD2	1807	531105	ktnf	tn027	2002	1:24000
Lonewood loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LwC	15659	523888	2tnvr	tn035	1998	1:24000
Lonewood loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	LwB	2734	523887	2tnvb	tn035	1998	1:24000
Lily-Lonewood complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes, rocky	LnC	1060	523886	2w2ns	tn035	1998	1:24000
Lonewood silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	LoB	21532	525254	2tnvf	tn061	1990	1:24000
Lonewood silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LoC	8682	525255	2tnvj	tn061	1990	1:24000
Lonewood silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	LnB	4993	1017869	2w2nx	tn065	1980	1:15840
Linker loam, rolling phase (Lonewood)	Lb	1757	526283	knmw	tn115	1951	1:20000
Linker loam, eroded rolling phase (Lonewood)	Lc	242	526284	knmx	tn115	1951	1:20000
Lonewood loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LwC	9347	843370	2tnvr	tn133	2003	1:24000
Lonewood loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	LwB	2755	843369	2tnvb	tn133	2003	1:24000
Lonewood-Hendon complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LnC	3360	728872	sgg0	tn143	2003	1:24000
Lonewood-Hendon complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes	LnB	912	728871	sgfz	tn143	2003	1:24000
Lonewood silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LoC	116	1473797	2tnvj	tn145	2005	1:24000
Lonewood silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	LoB	105	1473796	2tnvf	tn145	2005	1:24000
Lonewood silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LoC	7352	529628	2tnvj	tn153	1995	1:24000
Lonewood silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	LoB	5466	529627	2tnvf	tn153	1995	1:24000
Lonewood-Lily complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LwC	7896	2450738	2tnv1	tn177	1965	1:15840
Lonewood loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	LoB	2303	2450722	2tnvb	tn177	1965	1:15840
Lonewood loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LdC	42786	2454166	2tnvr	tn604	1974	1:20000
Lonewood silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LoC	15082	528661	2tnvj	tn604	1974	1:20000
Lonewood silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	LoB	3872	528660	2tnvf	tn604	1974	1:20000
Lonewood-Lily complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LeC	3046	2441404	2tnv1	tn604	1974	1:20000
Lonewood-Lily complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes	LeB	2416	2454164	2w2nw	tn604	1974	1:20000
Linker loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	LrC2	438	2427467	2mgzd	tn610	1960	1:15840
Linker loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LrC	218	2427466	2mgzc	tn610	1960	1:15840
Lonewood silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LoC	5556	2439107	2mw2w	tn629	2003	1:24000
Lonewood silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	LoB	2296	2439106	2mw2v	tn629	2003	1:24000
Lonewood silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes	LoC	1518	1707751	1vb1r	tn650	2008	1:12000
Lonewood silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	LoB	740	2406082	2lrqk	tn650	2008	1:12000
Lonewood-Clarkrange complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes	LoC	26307	2439175	2mw52	tn701	1985	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LONEWOOD soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).