Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LONDO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LONDO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LONDO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
98S76MI-73-6S1976MI073006Londo3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.5823139,-84.7499722
9907N0257S2006MI145002Londo1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.3554472,-83.7819778
9907N0258S2006MI145004Londo1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.3712556,-83.7888111

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LONDO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LONDO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LONDO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LONDO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LONDO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LONDO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LONDO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LONDO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MI-2012-02-06-51 | Saginaw County - January 1994

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Tappan-Londo-Poseyville association (Soil Survey of Saginaw County, Michigan; January 1994).

  2. MI-2012-02-06-52 | Tuscola County - September 1986

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Guelph-Londo-Tappan association (Soil Survey of Tuscola County, Michigan; September 1986).

Map Units

Map units containing LONDO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Londo-Poseyville complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesLpA32525078276838mi01119641:20000
Londo loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLnA15725078262wcfbmi01119641:20000
Londo-Selfridge complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesLwB7925078282whvzmi01119641:20000
Londo loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes43A322711865342wcfbmi01719781:20000
Londo-Poseyville complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes49A237301865356838mi01719781:20000
Londo-Selfridge complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes64B38641865502whvzmi01719781:20000
Urban land-Londo complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes53A21191865392whw5mi01719781:20000
Tappan-Londo-Poseyville complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes108A148725079956887mi01719781:20000
Tappan-Londo loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes102A18225079902whw4mi01719781:20000
Londo loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLoA17731898042wcfbmi05119661:15840
Londo-Selfridge complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesLpB21125078422whvzmi05119661:15840
Londo loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesLoB651898056chrmi05119661:15840
Poseyville-Londo complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesPxB1402673594686zmi05719751:12000
Guelph-Londo loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes51B1906018680068ctmi06319781:20000
Londo loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes57A49621868072wcfbmi06319781:20000
Tappan-Londo loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes119A15225081762whw4mi06319781:20000
Guelph-Londo loams, 1 to 6 percent slopes45B817186557683zmi07319831:15840
Urban land-Londo complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes57A7281865692whw6mi07319831:15840
Poseyville-Londo complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes110B1992673525686zmi07319831:15840
Poseyville-Londo complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesPxB4827186650686zmi11119761:15840
Londo loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLxA10941866412wcfbmi11119761:15840
Londo-Poseyville complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesLpA63525079726838mi11119761:15840
Tappan-Londo loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes160A3459926736262whw4mi14519911:15840
Tappan-Londo-Poseyville complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes68A118011866896887mi14519911:15840
Londo loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes76A65901866992wcfbmi14519911:15840
Londo-Poseyville complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes132A925079866838mi14519911:15840
Guelph-Londo loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes158B42673735692jmi14519911:15840
Londo loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLoA106611874252wcfbmi14719691:20000
Londo complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesLpA30771874276911mi14719691:20000
Londo loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLkA2399325082842wcfbmi15119551:15840
Guelph-Londo loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesGgB969250827168ctmi15119551:15840
Londo loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes, moderately erodedLgB29141883142wcfcmi15119551:15840
Londo complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesLpA9125082876911mi15119551:15840
Guelph-Londo loams, 0 to 6 percent slopesGhB362508272692jmi15119551:15840
Tappan-Londo loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes8A803701875242whw4mi15719841:15840
Guelph-Londo loams, 0 to 6 percent slopes20B27420187473692jmi15719841:15840
Londo loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes25A121671874772wcfbmi15719841:15840
Guelph-Londo loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes128B567250812668ctmi15719841:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LONDO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .