Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LINTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LINTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LINTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
5489P023288ND084079Linton4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.0030250549316,-100.58992767334
5489P023088ND085055Linton4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.2660789489746,-100.66854095459
5489P023188ND085076Linton4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.312744140625,-100.904106140137

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LINTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LINTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LINTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LINTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LINTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LINTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LINTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LINTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing LINTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesE3802B32292661684d1xlnd01519671:20000
Mandan-Linton silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesE3801A16312661685d1xpnd01519671:20000
Mandan-Linton silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesC710B162825641782pwf3nd01519671:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesE3802C157526617122q51tnd01519671:20000
Linton-Sutley-Mandan silt loams, 9 to 25 percent slopesE3802E132026617112q51nnd01519671:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesC710C77925640982pwdznd01519671:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesC710D62925641772pwf0nd01519671:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesE3802D45726617212qkwmnd01519671:20000
Linton-Sutley-Mandan silt loams, 9 to 35 percent slopesC710F32325640972pwdynd01519671:20000
Linton-Sutley silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesE3803C22872661763d1xnnd02919791:20000
Linton-Sutley-Flasher complex, 9 to 25 percent slopesE3807E14112661762d1xmnd02919791:20000
Linton-Sutley-Mandan silt loams, 9 to 35 percent slopesC710F50925969192pwdynd02919791:20000
Linton-Sutley silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesC718C1325958292qyg2nd02919791:20000
Mandan-Linton silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesC710B94925667152pwf3nd05519741:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesE3802B3762662444d1xlnd05519741:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesC710C31525666352pwdznd05519741:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesE3802C23426624762q51tnd05519741:20000
Linton-Sutley-Mandan silt loams, 9 to 35 percent slopesC710F17525666342pwdynd05519741:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesC710D15225667122pwf0nd05519741:20000
Linton-Sutley-Mandan silt loams, 9 to 25 percent slopesE3802E5126624752q51nnd05519741:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesE3802D2626624782qkwmnd05519741:20000
Mandan-Linton silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesE3801A242662445d1xpnd05519741:20000
Mandan-Linton silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesE3801A37452699288d1xpnd05719761:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesE3802B15362699284d1xlnd05719761:20000
Mandan-Linton silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesE3801A23682699184d1xpnd05919981:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesE3802B12692699182d1xlnd05919981:20000
Mandan-Linton silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesE3801A39742525979d1xpnd06519711:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesE3802B23022525980d1xlnd06519711:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesE3802C52725259812q51tnd06519711:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesE3802B63202699101d1xlnd08519921:24000
Linton-Sutley-Flasher complex, 9 to 25 percent slopesE3807E38492699102d1xmnd08519921:24000
Linton-Sutley silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesE3803C23722525632d1xnnd08519921:24000
Mandan-Linton silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesE3801A19392699103d1xpnd08519921:24000
Linton-Sutley-Flasher complex, 9 to 25 percent slopes231780337820cbjfnd08519921:24000
Linton silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesC712B1363127979252rrrbsd02119781:20000
Linton-Grassna silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesC713A837327979272rrrdsd02119781:20000
Linton silt loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes21B3329354691cx2nsd02119781:20000
Linton-Sutley silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesC718C258527979132qyg2sd02119781:20000
Linton-Sutley silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopes21C2234354692cx2psd02119781:20000
Linton-Sutley silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesC718B206927979302rrrksd02119781:20000
Linton-Grassna silt loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes21A1994354690cx2msd02119781:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesC710C181227978582pwdzsd02119781:20000
Linton-Zahl complex, 9 to 40 percent slopesC711F116727979262rrrcsd02119781:20000
Sutley-Linton silt loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesC719D105827979312rrrlsd02119781:20000
Linton-Sutley silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes22B35354694cx2rsd02119781:20000
Linton-Sutley-Mandan silt loams, 9 to 35 percent slopesC710F2527978572pwdysd02119781:20000
Sutley-Linton silt loams, 9 to 15 percent slopes65D4354734cx41sd02119781:20000
Linton silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesC712B167228001272rrrbsd12919751:20000
Linton-Sutley-Mandan silt loams, 9 to 35 percent slopesC710F139728000712pwdysd12919751:20000
Linton-Mandan silt loams, 6 to 9 percent slopesC710C114328000722pwdzsd12919751:20000
Sutley-Linton silt loams, 9 to 15 percent slopesC719D64828001302rrrlsd12919751:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LINTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .