Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LINECREEK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LINECREEK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LINECREEK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
43C93P0340S1992OR063014LINECREEK6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.2805557,-116.9694443

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LINECREEK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LINECREEK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LINECREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LINECREEK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LINECREEK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LINECREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LINECREEK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LINECREEK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing LINECREEK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Threebuck-Linecreek-Harlow complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes77F2446403524mnor62519791:20000
Bennettcreek-Bigcow-Linecreek complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes4178CO543931221511qxwvor62620181:24000
Anatone-Linecreek-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent south slopes5811DS40652437337nhy3or63120181:24000
Getaway-Linecreek-Anatone complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes6059CO10592437446nj30or63120181:24000
Kahler-Linecreek-Getaway complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes5777CO49224373041r1p7or63120181:24000
Kahler-Linecreek-Getaway complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes6065DN382437450nj72or63120181:24000
Threebuck-Tamarackcanyon-Linecreek complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes3509DN3024371382dvt9or63120181:24000
Tamarackcanyon-Linecreek-Harlow complex, 60 to 90 percent south slopes3500DS2424371272dvszor63120181:24000
Threebuck-Linecreek-Harlow complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes3426DN82437120njklor63120181:24000
Linecreek-Getaway complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes6015DN62437435njbcor63120181:24000
Threebuck-Linecreek-Harlow complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes3195246847142v4qor67019991:24000
Kahler-Linecreek-Getaway complex, 30 to 60 percent north slopes1503130845232tykor67019991:24000
Getaway-Linecreek-Anatone complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes923021848212v85or67019991:24000
Threebuck-Tamarackcanyon-Linecreek complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes3232629847182v4vor67019991:24000
Harlow-Tamarackcanyon-Linecreek complex, 60 to 90 percent south slopes1271480844982txror67019991:24000
Anatone-Linecreek-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent south slopes161282845352tyyor67019991:24000
Kahler-Linecreek-Getaway complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes1511097849982vfwor67019991:24000
Tamarackcanyon-Linecreek-Harlow complex, 60 to 90 percent south slopes311742847052v4for67019991:24000
Linecreek-Getaway complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes192526845672tzzor67019991:24000
Rock outcrop-Linecreek-Anatone complex, scarp, 60 to 90 percent slopes250347846352v25or67019991:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LINECREEK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .