Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LIMA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LIMA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LIMA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
10140A0261S1958NY011003Lima6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.7374992,-76.660553
10140A0262S1959NY109005Lima3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.6088905,-76.5908356
10106N0436S2005NY069006Lima6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.8688965,-77.0587769
10106N0440S2005NY069012Lima6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.9004593,-77.0695572
10106N0441S2005NY123013Lima6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.7438011,-77.0464249
10106N0881S2006NY069014Lima6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.7759323,-77.2279968
14006N0862S2006NY069010Lima5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.8635806,-77.33425
14006N0863S2006NY069012Lima5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.86245,-77.3379306

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LIMA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LIMA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LIMA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LIMA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LIMA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LIMA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LIMA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LIMA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NY-2010-09-28-21 | Otsego County - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Farmington-Wassaic general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Otsego County, New York; 2006).

  2. NY-2012-02-15-04 | Cayuga County - 1971

    Typical cross section of Honeoye-Lima association (Soil Survey of Cayuga County, New York; 1971).

  3. NY-2012-02-15-41 | Seneca County - April 1972

    Cross section of Honeoye-Lima association (Soil Survey of Seneca County, New York; April 1972).

  4. NY-2012-02-15-47 | Tompkins County - July 1965

    Typical cross section of Lima-Honeoye association and Palmyra association in northwestern Tompkins County (Soil Survey of Tompkins County, New York; July 1965).

Map Units

Map units containing LIMA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Lima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLtA222932894432w3khny01119681:15840
Lima silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLtB183902894442w3kkny01119681:15840
Lima loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLmB33442908432w3kfny02919791:15840
Lima loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLmA32772908422w3jvny02919791:15840
Urban land-Lima complex, 1 to 6 percent slopesUrA30002909182w3k1ny02919791:15840
Lima silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLmB111233017302w3kkny03720041:24000
Lima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLmA85103017292w3khny03720041:24000
Lima silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLoB687525183602w3kkny04320181:24000
Lima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLoA157925183592w3khny04320181:24000
Lima silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesLoC132525183612w3kmny04320181:24000
Lima loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes59B1024131056892w3kfny05120191:24000
Lima-Kendaia complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes159B887731057472y9xnny05120191:24000
Lima-Kendaia complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes159A723631057462y9xmny05120191:24000
Lima loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes59A320731056882w3jvny05120191:24000
Lima silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLtB77412925862w3kkny05319751:15840
Lima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLtA12802925852w3khny05319751:15840
Lima silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes, very stonyLuC7092925882w3klny05319751:15840
Lima silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesLtC5122925872w3kmny05319751:15840
Lima and Cazenovia soils, 0 to 6 percent slopes, bedrock substratum phaseLoB49372927232w3kgny05519671:15840
Lima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLnA18312927212w3khny05519671:15840
Lima silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLnB11102927222w3kkny05519671:15840
Lima gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes126B1930915314112w3kpny06519931:24000
Lima gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes126A533215314102w3knny06519931:24000
Lima gravelly silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes126C19815314122w3kqny06519931:24000
Lima silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLtB124772935982w3kkny06719731:20000
Lima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLtA21562935972w3khny06719731:20000
Lima loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes201B1494316110622w3kfny06920121:12000
Lima loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes201A1077816110612w3jvny06920121:12000
Lima loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, lower clay surface204A831816110642w3jyny06920121:12000
Lima loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, lower clay surface204B630816110652w3kbny06920121:12000
Lima loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes201C155716110632w3k8ny06920121:12000
Lima gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLkB16692942372w3kpny07719931:24000
Lima gravelly silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesLkC2222942382w3kqny07719931:24000
Mohawk and Lima soils, 2 to 10 percent slopesMlB68532945162w3kjny09519651:15840
Lima silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLtB106322947462w3kkny09919661:15840
Lima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLtA29572947452w3khny09919661:15840
Lima silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesLmB20302956452w3kkny10919631:20000
Lima silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesLmA1672956442w3khny10919631:20000
Lima loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes201A490014078222w3jvny12319481:12000
Lima loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes201B477432503692w3kfny12319481:12000
Lima loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, lower clay surface204A355414078192w3jyny12319481:12000
Lima loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, lower clay surface204B274432503682w3kbny12319481:12000
Lima loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes201C11132503762w3k8ny12319481:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LIMA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .