Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LIBORY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LIBORY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LIBORY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
6584P019683NE017031Libory7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.4972229,-99.8616638
6508N0834S2008NE005040Libory7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.4722137,-101.6714859

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LIBORY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LIBORY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LIBORY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LIBORY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LIBORY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LIBORY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LIBORY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LIBORY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NE-2012-02-13-27 | Holt County - March 1983

    Typical pattern of soils in the Els-Valentine-Ipage association and their relationship to topography and parent material (Soil Survey of Holt County, Nebraska; March 1983).

  2. NE-2012-02-13-37 | Kearney County - September 1984

    Typical pattern of soils in the Valentine association (Soil Survey of Kearney County, Nebraska; September 1984).

  3. NE-2012-02-13-99 | Sherman County - May 1990

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Loup-Bolent-Barney and Gibbon-Wann-Saltine associations (Soil Survey of Sherman County, Nebraska; May 1990).

Map Units

Map units containing LIBORY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Valentine-Libory complex, 0 to 9 percent slopes4867613124347352s81zne00519731:24000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes4370135924347302wgd9ne00519731:24000
Valentine-Libory complex, 0 to 9 percent slopes48675126057022s81zne00919881:20000
Valentine-Libory complex, moist, 0 to 9 percent slopes4862410128765972s820ne01719871:20000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes437036031000072wgd9ne01719871:20000
Valentine-Libory complex, 0 to 9 percent slopes48671581000382s81zne01719871:20000
Valentine-Libory complex, 0 to 9 percent slopes486726501004552s81zne03119951:24000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes437017841004032wgd9ne03119951:24000
Valentine-Libory complex, 0 to 9 percent slopes4867806217001911v25wne07920031:12000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes4370346417001601v24wne07920031:12000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes4370118101001212wgd9ne08919811:20000
Libory-Whitelake loamy fine sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes437430861001223c5rne08919811:20000
Valentine-Libory complex, 0 to 9 percent slopes486758426686782s81zne09119611:24000
Valentine-Libory complex, 0 to 9 percent slopes48673091122289042dtc4ne09319681:12000
Libory-Boelus loamy fine sands43739114997273bs0ne09319681:12000
Libory-Boelus fine sands4372957997263brzne09319681:12000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes437037922289002dtc0ne09319681:12000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes4370421216918651tsj9ne09919821:20000
Libory loamy fine sand, 3 to 6 percent slopes43711205427413gbrjne11919811:20000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes4370296217096631vd1fne12119781:20000
Valentine-Libory complex, 0 to 9 percent slopes4867322282552dsp6ne12119781:20000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes437020801002432wgd9ne14919821:20000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes4370227517000031v1ztne16319871:20000
Valentine-Libory complex, 0 to 9 percent slopes4867186826056922s81zne17119631:24000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes437066616998492wgd9ne18319841:20000
Valentine-Libory complex, 0 to 9 percent slopesT159C39213901282s81zsd00720041:20000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesT091A11313900932wgd9sd00720041:20000
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesT091A7513915622wgd9sd12119671:31680
Libory loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesT091A7425827782wgd9sd61320111:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LIBORY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .