Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LEW soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LEW, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LEW were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LEW soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LEW series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LEW series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LEW series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LEW share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LEW series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LEW series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LEW, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing LEW as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Lew very stony silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes44D1120516387kbbnva00319811:15840
Lew very stony silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes44C1030516386kbbmva00319811:15840
Lew extremely stony silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes45C660516388kbbpva00319811:15840
Lew extremely stony silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes45D520516389kbbqva00319811:15840
Lew bouldery silt loam, 10 to 45 percent slopes59E5646517949kcz1va01519781:15840
Lew bouldery silt loam, 45 to 70 percent slopes59F3315517950kcz2va01519781:15840
Lew very stony silt loam, 7 to 25 percent slopes58D1889517948kcz0va01519781:15840
Lew very stony silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes22D1657516527kbh5va04319801:15840
Lew very stony silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes22C693516526kbh4va04319801:15840
Lew channery silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, very stony88C2422189540221mb0va06120061:12000
Lew extremely stony loam, 25 to 75 percent slopesLeE3957516900kbw6va07919831:15840
Lew extremely stony loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesLeD2194516899kbw5va07919831:15840
Lew extremely stony loam, 7 to 15 percent slopesLeC1223516898kbw4va07919831:15840
Lew channery silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, stony88C1145642143pk69va10720061:12000
Lew channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, stony88D523642144pk6bva10720061:12000
Lew channery silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes, extremely bouldery30C14261370284ll8va12519921:24000
Lew channery silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, extremely bouldery30D11941370304llbva12519921:24000
Lew channery silt loam, 25 to 75 percent slopes, extremely bouldery30E9711370324lldva12519921:24000
Lew silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes28B3791369944lk5va12519921:24000
Lew silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes, extremely stony29B3771369984lk9va12519921:24000
Lew loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes, very stony22E1052518823kdw7va18719801:15840
Lew channery loam, 7 to 25 percent slopes21D989518822kdw6va18719801:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LEW soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .