Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LETHA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LETHA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LETHA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
1140A1082S1956ID045019LETHA5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.8601494,-116.5737534
1140A1081S1957ID045033LETHA5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.8737602,-116.6120911
1169C0128S1969ID075005Letha8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.9905548,-116.792778
1169C0134S1969ID075012Letha7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.9666672,-116.9436111

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LETHA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LETHA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LETHA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LETHA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LETHA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LETHA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LETHA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LETHA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing LETHA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Letha fine sandy loam, slightly saline-alkaliLf1511813562qndid65919711:20000
Letha fine sandy loamLe1095813552qncid65919711:20000
Letha fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesLpA1300806002pw0id66019621:15840
Letha fine sandy loam, deep, strongly saline-alkali, 0 to 1 percent slopesLtA1098806062pw6id66019621:15840
Letha fine sandy loam, deep, 0 to 1 percent slopesLrA1043806022pw2id66019621:15840
Letha fine sandy loam, strongly saline-alkali, 1 to 3 percent slopesLsB740806052pw5id66019621:15840
Letha fine sandy loam, strongly saline-alkali, 0 to 1 percent slopesLsA692806042pw4id66019621:15840
Letha fine sandy loam, deep, strongly saline-alkali, 1 to 3 percent slopesLtB679806072pw7id66019621:15840
Letha fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesLpB561806012pw1id66019621:15840
Letha loam, strongly saline-alkali, 0 to 1 percent slopesLuA209806082pw8id66019621:15840
Letha fine sandy loam, deep, 1 to 3 percent slopesLrB77806032pw3id66019621:15840
Letha fine sandy loam, strongly saline-alkali, 0 to 1 percent slopesLtA3212807922q26id66519671:20000
Letha fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesLsA1703807902q24id66519671:20000
Letha fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesLsB331807912q25id66519671:20000
Letha fine sandy loam, drained, 0 to 4 percent slopes95415325196232r29id68520121:24000
Letha loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes96293025196242r2bid68520121:24000
Letha-Baldock loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes97153125196252r2cid68520121:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LETHA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .