Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LEAFRIVER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LEAFRIVER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LEAFRIVER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
88UMN3394S1980MN1373394Leafriver3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.3824234,-92.7391205

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LEAFRIVER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LEAFRIVER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LEAFRIVER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LEAFRIVER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LEAFRIVER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LEAFRIVER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LEAFRIVER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LEAFRIVER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MI-2010-09-07-09 | Mackinac County - 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Leafriver-Croswell-Wainola association (Soil Survey of Mackinac County, Michigan; 1997).

  2. MI-2012-02-06-04 | Alcona County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Klacking-McGinn association (adjacent to the Lupton-Tawas-Leafriver association) (Soil Survey of Alcona County, Michigan; 1998).

  3. MI-2012-02-06-36 | Mackinac County - 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Leafriver-Croswell-Wainola association (Soil Survey of Mackinac County, Michigan; 1997).

  4. MN-2010-09-10-07 | Roseau County -

    Pattern of soils and underlying material in the Redby-Hiwood-Cormant association (Soil Survey of Roseau County, Minnesota).

Map Units

Map units containing LEAFRIVER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Leafriver muck1936601902506cz3mi00119931:20000
Leafriver-Wakeley complex27320971903026d0smi00119931:20000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes1975214552542xxj3mi00320071:24000
Leafriver muck19331912626f0rmi00719981:12000
Tawas-Leafriver mucks, 0 to 1 percent slopesTawleA327631559432ythrmi00919761:15840
Leafriver muck, 0 to 1 percent slopesLfraaA17831559322ythdmi00919761:15840
Gay-Leafriver complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes812530324418952myztmi01319841:20000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes811418124418942xxj3mi01319841:20000
Tawas-Leafriver mucks, 0 to 1 percent slopesTawleA4131870352ythrmi02919701:15840
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes50105344151592xxj3mi03319891:15840
Tawas-Leafriver mucks5180711897236cf3mi03919931:15840
Leafriver muck1932101896636cc5mi03919931:15840
Wakeley-Leafriver complex2753321897066cdkmi03919931:15840
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesDm67015880422xxj3mi04119691:24000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes2643484152122xxj3mi04319851:20000
Cathro-Leafriver complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes, frequently flooded68854714563431kwftmi05320071:24000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes65027614562262xxj3mi05320071:24000
Minocqua-Leafriver complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes211214563641kwghmi05320071:24000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes6721684161512xxj3mi06119891:20000
Gay-Leafriver complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes812571524837062pchkmi06119891:20000
Leafriver muck1924941917256fhpmi06919951:15840
Proper-Leafriver complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes372B8001918356fm7mi06919951:15840
Leafriver-Wakeley complex2736181918116flgmi06919951:15840
Minocqua-Leafriver complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes21355624524602n9zmmi07119921:20000
Tawas-Leafriver mucks51103311906636ddfmi07919981:12000
Leafriver muck1912821906346dchmi07919981:12000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes2310846274672xxj3mi09520041:24000
Leafriver-Croswell-Wainola complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes172B15854416349fz7mmi09719941:20000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes23125404163792xxj3mi09719941:20000
Eastport-Leafriver complex, 0 to 35 percent slopes38E10503416398fz96mi09719941:20000
Wainola-Leafriver-Pullup complex, 0 to 35 percent slopes48E2446416408fz9jmi09719941:20000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes1924663951462xxj3mi10319991:24000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes2190674154592xxj3mi10919851:20000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes30A70914564092xxj3mi13120071:24000
Tawas-Leafriver mucks513004241391835tmi13520031:12000
Leafriver-Wakeley complex273671241477838lmi13520031:12000
Leafriver muck19235241382835jmi13520031:12000
Tawas-Leafriver mucks5128881915056f8lmi13719981:12000
Leafriver muck194491914576f71mi13719981:12000
Tawas-Leafriver mucks51102021910306ds8mi14319991:12000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes632401614569482xxj3mi15320071:24000
Tawas-Leafriver complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes4240323781852ktpnmi6061:12000
Leafriver muck19848825432879gjfvmn00119961:20000
Forada and Leafriver soils, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes194212933974972w0mhmn00519941:20000
Deford-Leafriver complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesB76A4592653434sfxvmn00719911:24000
Leafriver muck198430494398872fd1vmn07719891:24000
Forada and Leafriver soils, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes1077114334355222w0mhmn11119961:20000
Minocqua-Leafriver-Cathro, 0 to 2 percent slopes, pondedC39A194273314091308xgmn11520091:24000
Cathro, Seelyeville, and Leafriver soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes, pondedC33A57553314094308xlmn11520091:24000
Redby-Hiwood-Leafriver complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes1274B16072394798f7tfmn13519991:24000
Leafriver muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes19847140394831f7vhmn13519991:24000
Leafriver muck, wooded, 0 to 1 percent slopes14025674394814f7tymn13519991:24000
Leafriver muck198412255428782gd5pmn15919871:20000
Forada and Leafriver soils, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes194244744287742w0mhmn15919871:20000
Forada and Leafriver soils, frequently ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes19425364350912w0mhmn17119981:12000
Leafriver-Deford, depressional-Markey complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesB71A233662943770sfxsmn62520151:24000
Deford-Leafriver complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesB76A201812943771sfxvmn62520151:24000
Leafriver-Cormant-Markey complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesB247A56129437932dv52mn62520151:24000
Cormant-Leafriver complex, 0 to 1 percent slopesB249A23729437952dv54mn62520151:24000
Minocqua-Leafriver-Cathro, 0 to 2 percent slopes, pondedC39A1683314106308xgwi01320041:12000
Cathro, Seelyeville, and Leafriver soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes, pondedC33A73314109308xlwi01320041:12000
Minocqua-Leafriver-Cathro, 0 to 2 percent slopes, pondedC39A77093314118308xgwi03120051:12000
Cathro, Seelyeville, and Leafriver soils, 0 to 1 percent slopes, pondedC33A25023314121308xlwi03120051:12000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesDeLe1869331190482xxj3wi07519871:20000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesDeLeA15383958552xxj3wi07819981:12000
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesDeLe409931190532xxj3wi08319851:15840
Deford and Leafriver soils, 0 to 2 percent slopesDeLe133631190582xxj3wi11519811:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LEAFRIVER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .