Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LAZEAR soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LAZEAR, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LAZEAR were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LAZEAR soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LAZEAR series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LAZEAR series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LAZEAR series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LAZEAR share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LAZEAR series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LAZEAR series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LAZEAR, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing LAZEAR as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Lazear-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 65 percent slopes4220534583031ynrco66919821:24000
Lazear stony loam, 6 to 25 percent slopes4115368583021ynqco66919821:24000
Lazear-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 65 percent slopes4837709043rstcco67020051:24000
Lazear-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 65 percent slopes646576901y0zco67119971:24000
Barx-Lazear, very flaggy-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 35 percent slopesB3158522990906k296co67619831:24000
Lazear, extremely flaggy-Rock outcrop-Wellsbasin, extremely stony complex, 20 to 75 percent slopesR338062990842k2cvco67619831:24000
Lazear-Cameo complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes352927469x9kvco67619831:24000
Barx-Lazear, very flaggy-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 35 percent slopesB3141451508654k296co67720181:24000
Lazear, extremely flaggy-Rock outcrop-Wellsbasin, extremely stony complex, 20 to 75 percent slopesR333363508736k2cvco67720181:24000
Lazear-Cameo complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes31470843350x9kvco67720181:24000
Lazear-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 30 percent slopes4914641496627jns7co67919761:24000
Shavano-Lazear complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes738592496654jnt3co67919761:24000
Lazear, extremely flaggy-Rock outcrop-Wellsbasin, extremely stony complex, 20 to 75 percent slopesR343552990843k2cvco67919761:24000
Barx-Lazear, very flaggy-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 35 percent slopesB3139872990948k296co67919761:24000
Barx-Lazear, very flaggy-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 35 percent slopesB3129293084830k296co68019701:31680
Lazear, extremely flaggy-Rock outcrop-Wellsbasin, extremely stony complex, 20 to 75 percent slopesR311282990841k2cvco68019701:31680
Cushman-Lazear stony loams, 15 to 65 percent slopes2122000496761jnxkco68319771:24000
Ildefonso-Lazear complex, 6 to 65 percent slopes356700496776jny1co68319771:24000
Gerst-Lazear-Rock outcrop complex, 4 to 20 percent slopesGSD357924822682pb05ut0131:24000
Lazear-Gerst-Pacon complex, 3 to 35 percent slopes08345360504901jyd4ut62320111:24000
Cedar Mountain-Lazear-Gerst complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes02732245504831jy9wut62320111:24000
Splimo-Pacon-Lazear complex, 3 to 25 percent slopes16124455188712121bpwut62320111:24000
Gerst-Lazear-Badland complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes04818291504907jydbut62320111:24000
Gerst-Lazear-Strych association, 15 to 60 percent slopes04915466504783jy8but62320111:24000
Lazear-Pacon-Rock outcrop complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes08412763504983jygsut62320111:24000
Molen-Lazear-Gerst complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes1038651186027220frsut62320111:24000
Rock outcrop-Lazear family-Pacon family complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes42055646331938552z92sut6251:24000
Neveset-Lazear-Grassytrail families complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes42002307831376312yp72ut6251:24000
Rock outcrop-Lazear family-Pacon family complex, 20 to 70 percent slopes4206677431938562z92tut6251:24000
Cedar Mountain-Lazear-Gerst, very stony complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes3205226531938822z93mut6251:24000
Lazear-Rock outcrop-Badland complex, 8 to 20 percent slopes762705504473jxybut63619841:24000
Zyme-Lazear-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 60 percent slopes1732606504407jxw6ut63619841:24000
Lazear family-Badland-Cannonville family complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes9E331486530hlvut6451:24000
Strych-Lazear families complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes9M331486430hltut6451:24000
Daklos-Lazear-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes2180526084621ifszut68519901:24000
Molen family-Lazear-Gerst complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes50826516302rm98ut68519901:24000
Badland, Kaiparowits Formation-Lazear, steep complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes513114122598622091ut68620041:24000
Sanostee, warm-Milok-Lazear, warm complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes51559938598702099ut68620041:24000
Atchee-Lazear, dry-Rock outcrop, Shinarump Conglomerate, complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes51059850597462059ut68620041:24000
Lazear, steep-Simel-Rock outcrop, Carmel Formation, complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes51692551602434n6wcut68620041:24000
Hiland-Bowbac-like-Lazear complex, 6 to 30 percent slopes5D0833028443013xwy6171:24000
Badland-Zigweid-like-Lazear complex, 6 to 25 percent slopes530229118522w7h2wy6291:24000
Lazear-Bunkwater-like-Samday-like complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes70515263853ttwy6291:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LAZEAR soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .